In re: Jerome Talley

Filing 79

ORDER RE: PENDING MOTIONS AND PETITION. Respondent's proposed motions and habeas petition (Dkts. 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 ) will not be allowed to proceed. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. **1 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(SWT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 5 6 In re: JEROME TALLEY, Case No. MC15-164 RSM 7 Respondent. ORDER REGARDING PENDING MOTIONS AND PETITION 8 9 10 THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #75); 11 Motion for Immediate Release (Dkt. #76); Motion to Relate Back to 2015 Habeas Case (Dkt. #77); 12 and a Proposed Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 USC Section 2241 (Dkt. #78). Each 13 of the three motions raises arguments previously raised and rejected by the Court, and in any event 14 are not supported by the case law cited by Respondent. With respect to the proposed Habeas 15 Petition, Plaintiff violates his bar order by failing to submit a Declaration stating that the issues 16 raised in the Petition have not been previously litigation. See Dkt. #3 at ¶ ¶ 1 and 2. Indeed, 17 Plaintiff explicitly states that he previously raised the issues in a prior matter. 18 Accordingly, Respondent’s proposed motions and habeas petition (Dkts. #75, #76, #77 and #78) 19 will not be allowed to proceed. The Clerk SHALL provide copies of this Order to Petitioner. 20 Dkt. #78. DATED this 24th day of August 2018. 21 A 22 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 ORDER - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?