Kelly v. Colvin
Filing
24
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 22 Motion for Attorney Fees, by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (SWT)
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
CHRISTIN KELLY,
10
Plaintiff,
v.
11
CASE NO. C16-0037-JCC
ORDER GRANTING EAJA
ATTORNEY FEES
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security, 1
12
13
14
Defendant.
15
16
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Christin Kelly’s unopposed motion for
17
attorney fees (Dkt. No. 22). Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff is hereby AWARDED
18
attorney fees in the amount of $5,048.38 and expenses in the amount of $20.22 pursuant to the
19
Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). If the U.S. Department of the
20
Treasury determines that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees, expenses, and costs are not subject to any offset
21
allowed under the Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program, as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff,
22
560 U.S. 586 (2010), payment of this award shall be made to Plaintiff’s attorney, Robert
23
Friedman. Whether payable to Plaintiff, or to Robert Friedman, the check shall be mailed to
24
25
26
1
Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as
the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of
section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
ORDER GRANTING EAJA ATTORNEY FEES
PAGE - 1
1
Robert Friedman at 3410 Broadway, Everett, WA 98201.
2
3
DATED this 30th day of March 2017.
A
4
5
6
John C. Coughenour
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING EAJA ATTORNEY FEES
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?