American Whitewater et al v. Electron Hydro, LLC et al

Filing 68

ORDER re Parties' 64 Joint Stipulated Motion to Dismiss. The Court dismisses this case with prejudice but retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' stipulation. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (SR)

Download PDF
The Honorable John C. Coughenour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SEATTLE DIVISION 10 AMERICAN WHITEWATER et al., No. 2:16-cv-00047-JCC 11 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: C16-cv-47-JCC 12 13 14 15 ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) ELECTRON HYDRO, LLC, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) __________________________________________) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Parties’ Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Settlement/Dismissal Case No. 2:16-cv-00047-JCC PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL 1 Plaintiffs American Whitewater, et al. and Defendants Electron Hydro, LLC, et al. hereby 2 respectfully file this stipulation and proposed order to voluntarily dismiss this case pursuant to 3 FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2). 4 Whereas, Plaintiffs filed this case on January 12, 2016, alleging that Defendants had 5 violated and continue to violate Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 6 1538, by causing “take” of ESA-listed Chinook salmon, steelhead trout, and bull trout by 7 operations of the Electron Hydroelectric Project on the Puyallup River in Washington (Dkt. #1); 8 Whereas, Plaintiffs alleged that to lawfully operate the project, Defendants are required to 9 obtain incidental take permits under Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA, 16 U.S.C. § 1539(a)(1)(B). 10 (Dkt. #1); 11 Whereas, in their original and operative pleadings (Dkt. #30), Plaintiffs sought and seek 12 as relief, among other things, that the Court order Defendants to cease diverting water and fish 13 from the Puyallup River in the period before Defendants obtain incidental take permits under 14 Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA from the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) and from 15 the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”); 16 Whereas, on June 18, 2021, upon motions for preliminary relief, the Court ordered that 17 Defendants shall not open the project intake and divert water or fish in the period before they 18 obtain incidental take permits under Section 10(a)(1) of the ESA from NMFS and USFWS (Dkt. 19 #58); 20 Accordingly, Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby agree and stipulate that: 21 1. Defendants shall not open the project intake and divert water or fish from the Puyallup 22 River before they obtain from NMFS and USFWS incidental take permits under Section 10(a)(1) 23 of the ESA that address effects of the actions on Chinook, steelhead trout, and bull trout; 24 2. Defendants shall provide Plaintiffs with notice of their submission of any final 25 application to NMFS and/or USFWS, and any proposed Habitat Conservation Plan and 26 supporting materials, for permits under Section 10(a)(1) of the ESA; Parties’ Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Dismissal Case No. 2:16-cv-00047-JCC 1 1 3. Defendants shall notify Plaintiffs within five (5) days of the receipt of any permits under 2 Section 10(a)(1) of the ESA from NMFS and USFWS; 3 4. Defendants shall notify Plaintiffs seven (7) days before they open the intake; 4 5. Defendants shall not perform in-water work at the headworks site at the project without 5 agency permits or other authority to do so; 6 6. Defendants shall pay Plaintiffs $225,000 in order to satisfy any and all claims for 7 attorneys’ fees, costs, or other expenses that might be brought and may be available to Plaintiffs 8 in this case. Defendants’ agreement to pay Plaintiffs that sum does not in any way constitute any 9 admission by Defendants as to any fact alleged or any liability for any claim or claims alleged in 10 this case. Defendants shall pay Plaintiffs that sum within 45 days of a court order dismissing this 11 case. 12 7. The Court shall dismiss this case with prejudice but retain jurisdiction to enforce the 13 terms of the parties’ stipulation. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Date: March 2, 2022. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Peter M. K. Frost Peter M. K. Frost, pro hac vice Western Environmental Law Center 120 Shelton McMurphey Blvd., Suite 340 Eugene, Oregon 97401 541-359-3238 frost@westernlaw.org /s/ Andrew M. Hawley Andrew M. Hawley, WSB #53052 Western Environmental Law Center 1402 3rd Ave., Suite 1022 Seattle, Washington 98101 206-487-7250 hawley@westernlaw.org Attorneys for Plaintiffs /s/ Svend A. Brandt-Erichsen Svend A. Brandt-Erichsen, WSBA # 23923 NOSSAMAN LLP Parties’ Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Dismissal Case No. 2:16-cv-00047-JCC 2 2 719 Second Avenue, Suite 1200 Seattle, Washington 98104 Tel: (206) 395-7630 sbrandterichsen@nossaman.com 3 Attorney for Defendants 1 4 5 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 DATED this 25th day of March 2022. A 8 9 10 John C. Coughenour UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Parties’ Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Dismissal Case No. 2:16-cv-00047-JCC 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?