United States of America, Ex rel. Raju A.T. Dahlstrom et al v. Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe of Washington et al

Filing 110

ORDER directing Defendants to respond to Attorney Richard L. Pope, Jr.'s 106 MOTION for Reconsideration. Response due 12/16/2019, Reply due 12/20/2019. MOTION for Reconsideration is re-noted for 12/20/2019. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) cc: Plaintiff via first class mail

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 SAUK-SUIATTLE INDIAN TRIBE OF WASHINGTON, 14 CASE NO. C16-0052JLR ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Defendant. 15 Before the court is Attorney Richard L. Pope, Jr.’s motion for reconsideration in 16 part of the court’s November 15, 2019, order. (MFR (Dkt. # 106); see also 11/15/19 17 Order (Dkt. # 105).) Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(h)(3), the court directs Defendants to 18 respond to Mr. Pope’s motion for reconsideration in part by no later than Monday, 19 December 16, 2019. See Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 7(h)(3). Defendants responsive 20 memorandum shall be no longer than seven (7) pages. Mr. Pope’s reply, if any, shall be 21 filed by no later than Friday, December 20, 2019, and shall be no longer than four (4) 22 ORDER - 1 1 pages in length. The court DIRECTS the clerk to re-note Mr. Pope’s motion for 2 reconsideration in part (Dkt. # 106) to December 20, 2019. 3 Dated this 4th day of December, 2019. 4 5 A 6 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?