United States of America, Ex rel. Raju A.T. Dahlstrom et al v. Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe of Washington et al
Filing
110
ORDER directing Defendants to respond to Attorney Richard L. Pope, Jr.'s 106 MOTION for Reconsideration. Response due 12/16/2019, Reply due 12/20/2019. MOTION for Reconsideration is re-noted for 12/20/2019. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) cc: Plaintiff via first class mail
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
13
SAUK-SUIATTLE INDIAN TRIBE
OF WASHINGTON,
14
CASE NO. C16-0052JLR
ORDER DIRECTING
DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
Defendant.
15
Before the court is Attorney Richard L. Pope, Jr.’s motion for reconsideration in
16
part of the court’s November 15, 2019, order. (MFR (Dkt. # 106); see also 11/15/19
17
Order (Dkt. # 105).) Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(h)(3), the court directs Defendants to
18
respond to Mr. Pope’s motion for reconsideration in part by no later than Monday,
19
December 16, 2019. See Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 7(h)(3). Defendants responsive
20
memorandum shall be no longer than seven (7) pages. Mr. Pope’s reply, if any, shall be
21
filed by no later than Friday, December 20, 2019, and shall be no longer than four (4)
22
ORDER - 1
1
pages in length. The court DIRECTS the clerk to re-note Mr. Pope’s motion for
2
reconsideration in part (Dkt. # 106) to December 20, 2019.
3
Dated this 4th day of December, 2019.
4
5
A
6
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?