United States of America, Ex rel. Raju A.T. Dahlstrom et al v. Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe of Washington et al

Filing 58

ORDER denying Defendants Ronda Metcalf, Christine Morlock, and Robert Morlock's 56 Motion to Compel Discovery without prejudice to refiling the motion in a manner that comports with the court's scheduling order. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. RAJU A.T. DAHLSTROM, et al., 12 ORDER STRIKING DISCOVERY MOTION Plaintiffs, v. 13 14 CASE NO. C16-0052JLR SAUK-SUIATTLE INDIAN TRIBE OF WASHINGTON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Before the court is Defendants Ronda Metcalf, Christine Morlock, and Robert Morlock’s (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to compel Plaintiff Raju A.T. Dahlstrom to produce responses and supplement responses to certain discovery requests. (Mot. (Dkt. # 56).) Defendants filed their motion without first requesting a conference with the court. (See Dkt.) The motion therefore contravenes the court’s August 3, 2017, amended scheduling order. (See Am. Sched. Order (Dkt. # 53) at 2 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. ORDER - 1 1 16(b)(3)(B)(v)) (“[P]ursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, the Court ‘direct[s] 2 that before moving for an order relating to discovery, the movant must request a 3 conference with the court’ by notifying [the courtroom deputy] . . . .” (second alteration 4 in original))); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(3)(B)(v) (permitting the court, in its 5 scheduling order, to “direct that before moving for an order relating to discovery, the 6 movant must request a conference with the court”). The court therefore STRIKES 7 Defendants’ motion to compel discovery (Dkt. # 56) without prejudice to refiling the 8 motion in a manner that comports with the court’s scheduling order. 9 Dated this 26th day of April, 2018. 10 11 A 12 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?