Stohr v. Prime Texas Services, LLC et al

Filing 27

ORDER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik granting Plaintiff's 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. Clerk directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendants Alaniz and Phelan as stated in the Order. (AD) Modified on 8/18/2016 cc: Alaniz and Phelan via US mail(AD).

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13

CURTIS STOHR, as Trustee of 519 East
28th Street Trust 04112014,
Plaintiff,
Case No. C16-064RSL
v.
PRIME TEXAS SERVICES, LLC,
KATY PHELAN, and ALBERTO
ALANIZ II,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT

Defendants.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

This matter comes before the Court on “Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
Against Defendants Alaniz and Phelan” Dkt. # 23. Defendants have not opposed the
motion, and the Court considers such a failure to be “an admission that the motion has
merit.” Local Civil Rule 7(b)(2). The Court has also reviewed the motion on its merits
and finds that summary judgment is appropriate.
The Clerk of Court is therefore directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and
against defendants Alaniz and Phelan for the following: $318,000 loan principle; interest
through November 14, 2015 of $18,661.41; post-default interest after November 14, 2015
through May 31, 2016 of $41,192.70; release fees of $101,760 as provided in Section 6 of
the promissory note; $6,360 as provided in Section 3.2 of the extension agreement;
attorney’s fees of $10,800; and court costs of $816. These items add up to a total of
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT - 1

1

$497,590.11, as well as daily interest of $209.10 for each day after May 31, 2016 until the

2

loan is paid.

3
4

Dated this 18th day of August, 2016.

A

5

Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT - 2