Bank of New York Mellon v. Stafne et al
Filing
125
MINUTE ORDER per remand 124 Order of USCA, plaintiff is directed to file by 5/12/2017 a proposed amended judgment together with an affidavit in support thereof, that includes the judgment summary information identified by RCW 4.64.030 and is consistent with this Court's indicative ruling under Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1. Defendants' Objections due 5/19/2017; Plaintiff's response, if any, due 5/26/2016. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (PM)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
4
5
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,
6
Plaintiff,
7
C16-77 TSZ
v.
8
9
SCOTT STAFNE AND TODD
STAFNE,
Defendants.
10
11
12
MINUTE ORDER
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge:
(1)
On April 20, 2017, the Ninth Circuit remanded the above-captioned case
13 “for the limited purpose of enabling the district court to consider [Bank of New York
Mellon’s] motion to amend the December 17, 2016, judgment,” docket no. 124.
14 Accordingly, plaintiff is DIRECTED to file, on or before Friday May 12, 2017, a
proposed amended judgment, together with an affidavit in support thereof, that includes
15 the judgment summary information identified by RCW 4.64.030 and is consistent with
this Court’s indicative ruling under Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1, see Minute Order, docket no.
16 123, and Order granting summary judgment, docket no. 114. Defendants may file
objections to the proposed amended judgment, not to exceed eight (8) pages, on or before
17 Friday, May 19, 2017. Any response by plaintiff to defendants’ objections shall not
exceed eight (8) pages and shall be filed on or before Friday, May 26, 2017.
18
(2)
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of
19 record.
20
Dated this 9th day of May, 2017.
William M. McCool
Clerk
21
22
s/Karen Dews
Deputy Clerk
23
MINUTE ORDER - 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?