Bank of New York Mellon v. Stafne et al

Filing 125

MINUTE ORDER per remand 124 Order of USCA, plaintiff is directed to file by 5/12/2017 a proposed amended judgment together with an affidavit in support thereof, that includes the judgment summary information identified by RCW 4.64.030 and is consistent with this Court's indicative ruling under Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1. Defendants' Objections due 5/19/2017; Plaintiff's response, if any, due 5/26/2016. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 4 5 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, 6 Plaintiff, 7 C16-77 TSZ v. 8 9 SCOTT STAFNE AND TODD STAFNE, Defendants. 10 11 12 MINUTE ORDER The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: (1) On April 20, 2017, the Ninth Circuit remanded the above-captioned case 13 “for the limited purpose of enabling the district court to consider [Bank of New York Mellon’s] motion to amend the December 17, 2016, judgment,” docket no. 124. 14 Accordingly, plaintiff is DIRECTED to file, on or before Friday May 12, 2017, a proposed amended judgment, together with an affidavit in support thereof, that includes 15 the judgment summary information identified by RCW 4.64.030 and is consistent with this Court’s indicative ruling under Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1, see Minute Order, docket no. 16 123, and Order granting summary judgment, docket no. 114. Defendants may file objections to the proposed amended judgment, not to exceed eight (8) pages, on or before 17 Friday, May 19, 2017. Any response by plaintiff to defendants’ objections shall not exceed eight (8) pages and shall be filed on or before Friday, May 26, 2017. 18 (2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of 19 record. 20 Dated this 9th day of May, 2017. William M. McCool Clerk 21 22 s/Karen Dews Deputy Clerk 23 MINUTE ORDER - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?