Bank of New York Mellon v. Stafne et al

Filing 140

MINUTE ORDER re Plaintiff's 126 Proposed Amended Judgment. The parties are DIRECTED to submit supplemental briefing addressing discrepancy on or before 6/13/2017. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Plaintiff, 9 10 11 C16-77 TSZ v. SCOTT STAFNE AND TODD STAFNE, 12 MINUTE ORDER Defendants. 13 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable 14 Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: (1) Having reviewed plaintiff’s proposed amended judgment, docket no. 126, it appears that the proposed amended judgment includes an abbreviated legal description 16 that encompasses boundary lines which are inconsistent with the full legal description of the property encompassed by the Deed of Trust. See Proposed Amended Judgment, at 3; 17 see also Response, docket no. 129. The parties are DIRECTED to submit supplemental briefing addressing this discrepancy on or before June 13, 2017. The parties’ 18 supplemental briefs shall not exceed ten (10) pages. 15 (2) In addition, the parties’ supplemental briefs should address whether, in light of the notice informing the Court that defendant Todd Stafne is now deceased, see Notice 20 of Deceased Defendant, docket no. 130, substitution of Todd Stafne’s successor or representative pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a) is required prior to any ruling on 21 plaintiff’s motion to amend the judgment. 19 22 23 MINUTE ORDER - 1 1 (3) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to defendants and all counsel of record. 2 Dated this 6th day of June, 2017. 3 William M. McCool Clerk 4 5 s/Karen Dews Deputy Clerk 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 MINUTE ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?