Bank of New York Mellon v. Stafne et al
Filing
140
MINUTE ORDER re Plaintiff's 126 Proposed Amended Judgment. The parties are DIRECTED to submit supplemental briefing addressing discrepancy on or before 6/13/2017. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,
Plaintiff,
9
10
11
C16-77 TSZ
v.
SCOTT STAFNE AND TODD
STAFNE,
12
MINUTE ORDER
Defendants.
13
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
14 Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge:
(1)
Having reviewed plaintiff’s proposed amended judgment, docket no. 126, it
appears that the proposed amended judgment includes an abbreviated legal description
16 that encompasses boundary lines which are inconsistent with the full legal description of
the property encompassed by the Deed of Trust. See Proposed Amended Judgment, at 3;
17 see also Response, docket no. 129. The parties are DIRECTED to submit supplemental
briefing addressing this discrepancy on or before June 13, 2017. The parties’
18 supplemental briefs shall not exceed ten (10) pages.
15
(2)
In addition, the parties’ supplemental briefs should address whether, in light
of the notice informing the Court that defendant Todd Stafne is now deceased, see Notice
20 of Deceased Defendant, docket no. 130, substitution of Todd Stafne’s successor or
representative pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a) is required prior to any ruling on
21 plaintiff’s motion to amend the judgment.
19
22
23
MINUTE ORDER - 1
1
(3)
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to defendants and
all counsel of record.
2
Dated this 6th day of June, 2017.
3
William M. McCool
Clerk
4
5
s/Karen Dews
Deputy Clerk
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
MINUTE ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?