Lee et al v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia
Filing
22
ORDER granting Defendant's 20 Motion to File Over-Length Brief Regarding Motion to Dismiss. The 21 Motion to Dismiss is renoted for 5/26/2017. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (PM)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
SEATTLE DIVISION
6
7
8
JUNG NYEO LEE, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
9
10
11
12
v.
INSURANCE CORPORATION OF
BRITISH COLUMBIA,
NO. C16-0084RSL
ORDER REGARDING ICBC'S
MOTION TO FILE OVER-LENGTH
BRIEF REGARDING MOTION TO
DISMISS
Defendant.
13
14
15
16
THIS MATTER came before the court on “Defendant ICBC’s Motion to File
Over-Length Brief Regarding Motion to Dismss.” Dkt. # 20. The underlying motion
17
18
19
20
21
to dismiss was filed on the same day as the motion for leave to file an over-length
brief, contrary to the requirements of LCR 7(f)(1).
The Court will accept the over-length motion but provide plaintiffs the full
allotment of time in which to respond to the issues raised. The Clerk of Court is
22
23
directed to renote the motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 21) on the Court’s calendar for Friday,
24
May 26, 2017. Pursuant to LCR 7(f)(4), the opposition memorandum may be up to
25
thirty-six pages in length and the reply shall not exceed eighteen pages.
26
ORDER REGARDING ICBC'S MOTION TO FILE
OVERLENGTH BRIEF REGARDING MOTION TO
DISMISS – Page 1
1
2
3
Dated this 24th day of April, 2017.
A
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER REGARDING ICBC'S MOTION TO FILE
OVERLENGTH BRIEF REGARDING MOTION TO
DISMISS – Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?