Lee et al v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia

Filing 22

ORDER granting Defendant's 20 Motion to File Over-Length Brief Regarding Motion to Dismiss. The 21 Motion to Dismiss is renoted for 5/26/2017. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SEATTLE DIVISION 6 7 8 JUNG NYEO LEE, et al., Plaintiffs, 9 10 11 12 v. INSURANCE CORPORATION OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, NO. C16-0084RSL ORDER REGARDING ICBC'S MOTION TO FILE OVER-LENGTH BRIEF REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS Defendant. 13 14 15 16 THIS MATTER came before the court on “Defendant ICBC’s Motion to File Over-Length Brief Regarding Motion to Dismss.” Dkt. # 20. The underlying motion 17 18 19 20 21 to dismiss was filed on the same day as the motion for leave to file an over-length brief, contrary to the requirements of LCR 7(f)(1). The Court will accept the over-length motion but provide plaintiffs the full allotment of time in which to respond to the issues raised. The Clerk of Court is 22 23 directed to renote the motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 21) on the Court’s calendar for Friday, 24 May 26, 2017. Pursuant to LCR 7(f)(4), the opposition memorandum may be up to 25 thirty-six pages in length and the reply shall not exceed eighteen pages. 26 ORDER REGARDING ICBC'S MOTION TO FILE OVERLENGTH BRIEF REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS – Page 1 1 2 3 Dated this 24th day of April, 2017. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER REGARDING ICBC'S MOTION TO FILE OVERLENGTH BRIEF REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS – Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?