Jones v. Colvin

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. The matter is REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to the Commissioner for further consideration. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 TERRY LYNN JONES, Plaintiff, 10 Case No. C16-135RSL-JRC v. 11 12 13 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Defendant. 14 15 16 17 The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Judge J. Richard Creatura, United States Magistrate Judge, and the relevant record, does hereby find and ORDER: 18 19 20 (1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.1 (2) The matter is REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 21 U.S.C. § 405(g) to the Commissioner for further consideration. 22 23 1 27 Defendant does not object to the bulk of the Report and Recommendation, but asks the Court not to adopt certain statements in Part 2 of the Discussion. The challenged statements appear in the context of the Report and Recommendation’s conclusion that substantial evidence does not support the ALJ’s finding that plaintiff has the residual functional capacity to perform medium work. Because this conclusion is sufficiently justified by Part 1 of the Discussion (finding that the ALJ insufficiently considered available medical evidence), the Court need not address the statements identified by defendant. 28 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1 24 25 26 1 (3) JUDGMENT is for plaintiff and the case should be closed. 2 (4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to counsel of record. 3 4 5 DATED this 4th day of January, 2017. 6 7 8 A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?