United States et alv. Diversified Maintenance Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 26

ORDER EXTENDING STAY of case to 8/1/2018; parties directed to file a Joint Status Report no later than 8/1/2018. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES, for the use and benefit of TERAS CONSTRUCTION, LLC, 12 ORDER EXTENDING STAY Plaintiff, v. 13 14 CASE NO. C16-0150JLR DIVERSIFIED MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Before the court is the parties’ joint status report and response to the court’s order to show cause. (See JSR (Dkt. # 25); see also OSC (Dkt. # 24).) The parties state that they have agreed to mediate the underlying arbitration on April 3, 2018, and to re-set the dates for the arbitration “on an immediate basis” if they are unsuccessful in reaching settlement. (JSR at 1-2.) On this basis, they ask the court to extend the stay in this case to August 1, 2018. (Id. at 2.) The court GRANTS this joint request and extends the stay ORDER - 1 1 to August 1, 2018. The court also ORDERS the parties to file a joint status report within 2 one week of any settlement or other resolution of the underlying arbitration, but in any 3 event by no later than August 1, 2018. 4 The court also reviewed the parties’ response to the court’s order to show cause 5 why the court should not impose sanctions for the parties’ failure to timely file a March 6 20, 2018, joint status report as the court directed in its September 20, 2017, order. (See 7 JSR at 2-3.) Based on their response, the court declines to impose sanctions on the 8 parties at this time. The court cautions, however, that any further noncompliance with 9 the court’s orders is likely to result in sanctions. 10 Dated this 4th day of April, 2018. 11 12 A 13 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?