Walker v. Holland America Line-USA Inc et al

Filing 23

ORDER denying without prejudice parties' 22 Stipulation for Continuation of Trial Date and Related Deadlines. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (TH)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

8
9
10

WILLIAM WALKER,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13

CASE NO. C16-155 MJP
ORDER ON MOTION TO REVISE
CASE SCHEDULE

v.
HOLLAND AMERICA LINE-USA,
INC, et al.,

14
Defendants.
15
16
The Court, having received and reviewed the Stipulation and Proposed Order for
17
Continuation of Trial Date and Related Deadlines (Dkt. No. 22), makes the following findings:
18
The motion contains insufficient facts to establish good cause for a continuance/revision.
19
Specifically, the Court requires at least 90 days between the dispositive motions deadline and the
20
trial date, which the parties’ proposed revisions to the case schedule do not reflect.
21
Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the request to revise the existing case schedule is
22
DENIED without prejudice to bring a renewed motion which cures the defects noted above and
23
outlines a plan for meeting the revised deadlines.
24

ORDER ON MOTION TO REVISE CASE SCHEDULE - 1

1

The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel.

2

Dated October 18, 2017.

4

A

5

Marsha J. Pechman
United States District Judge

3

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

ORDER ON MOTION TO REVISE CASE SCHEDULE - 2