Walker v. Holland America Line-USA Inc et al

Filing 23

ORDER denying without prejudice parties' 22 Stipulation for Continuation of Trial Date and Related Deadlines. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (TH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 WILLIAM WALKER, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 CASE NO. C16-155 MJP ORDER ON MOTION TO REVISE CASE SCHEDULE v. HOLLAND AMERICA LINE-USA, INC, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 The Court, having received and reviewed the Stipulation and Proposed Order for 17 Continuation of Trial Date and Related Deadlines (Dkt. No. 22), makes the following findings: 18 The motion contains insufficient facts to establish good cause for a continuance/revision. 19 Specifically, the Court requires at least 90 days between the dispositive motions deadline and the 20 trial date, which the parties’ proposed revisions to the case schedule do not reflect. 21 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the request to revise the existing case schedule is 22 DENIED without prejudice to bring a renewed motion which cures the defects noted above and 23 outlines a plan for meeting the revised deadlines. 24 ORDER ON MOTION TO REVISE CASE SCHEDULE - 1 1 The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel. 2 Dated October 18, 2017. 4 A 5 Marsha J. Pechman United States District Judge 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER ON MOTION TO REVISE CASE SCHEDULE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?