Kische USA LLC v Simsek et al
Filing
100
ORDER striking Plaintiff's 96 second motion for partial summary judgment and directing Kische to refile the motion in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Civil Rules. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
KISCHE USA LLC,
CASE NO. C16-0168JLR
Plaintiff,
11
ORDER
v.
12
13
ALI SIMSEK, et al.,
Defendants.
14
15
On September 29, 2017, Plaintiff Kische USA LLC (“Kische”) filed a second
16
motion for partial summary judgment. (2d MSJ (Dkt. # 96).) Kische’s counsel did not,
17
however, sign the motion as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Western
18
District of Washington’s Local Civil Rules require. (See id. at 30 (showing blank space
19
for counsel’s signature)); Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a) (“Every pleading, written motion, and
20
other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney’s
21
name . . . .”); Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 10(e)(4) (“All pleadings, motions[,] and
22
other filings shall be dated and signed as provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11,
ORDER - 1
1
LCR 11, and the court’s Electronic Filing Procedures.”); id. LCR 11(a). The court
2
therefore DIRECTS the Clerk to strike the motion (Dkt. # 96) and Kische to refile the
3
motion in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Civil
4
Rules. Upon refiling, Kische must renote the motion pursuant to Local Civil Rule
5
7(d)(3). Id. LCR 7(d)(3) (“[M]otions for summary judgment . . . shall be noted for
6
consideration on a date no earlier than the fourth Friday after filing and service of the
7
motion.”).
8
Dated this 2nd day of October, 2017.
9
10
A
11
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?