Teras Chartering, LLC v. Hyupjin Shipping Co., Ltd

Filing 106

ORDER granting Defendant's 104 Motion for Entry of Judgment signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (TH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 9 10 11 IN ADMIRALTY AND AT LAW TERAS CHARTERING, LLC, No.: Plaintiff, v. 2:16-cv-00188-RSM ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT HYUPJIN SHIPPING CO., LTD., Defendant. 12 13 THIS MATTER having come on regularly before the undersigned Judge of the 14 above-entitled Court on Hyupjin’s Motion for Relief from Discovery Deadline; and the Court 15 having considered Hyupjin’s Motion for Entry of Judgment and all exhibits and attachments 16 thereto; the Plaintiff having failed to respond to the motion, and the Court having reviewed 17 the records and files herein, and being fully advised in the premises; now, therefore, 18 19 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Hyupjin’s Motion for Entry of Judgment is GRANTED, and 20 The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Hyupjin Shipping Co. Ltd. and 21 against Teras Chartering, LLC, in the amount of $312,677.47, plus post-judgment interest at 22 the rate of 2.24%. 23 DATED this 22nd day of May, 2018. A 24 25 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 LAW OFFICES OF ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT- 1 (2:16-cv-00188-RSM) NICOLL BLACK & FEIG PLLC 1325 FOURTH AVENUE SUITE 1650 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 838-7555 1 Presented by: 2 NICOLL BLACK & FEIG PLLC 3 4 5 6 /s/ Jeremy B. Jones Christopher W. Nicoll, WSBA No. 20771 Jeremy B. Jones, WSBA No. 44138 Attorneys for Defendant Hyupjin Shipping Co., Ltd. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 LAW OFFICES OF ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT- 2 (2:16-cv-00188-RSM) NICOLL BLACK & FEIG PLLC 1325 FOURTH AVENUE SUITE 1650 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 838-7555

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?