Mutschler v. United States of America

Filing 12

MINUTE ORDER granting Petitioner's 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel, CJA Administrator is DIRECTED to appoint counsel; RE-NOTING to 5/26/2017 9 Motion for Protective Order; RE-NOTING to 7/7/2017 1 Motion to Vacate. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT) (cc: CJA Administrator and J. Gregory Lockwood via email, Petitioner via USPS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 RICHARD THAYNE MUTSCHLER, Petitioner, 10 11 12 15 (related to CR14-328 TSZ) v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MINUTE ORDER Respondent. 13 14 C16-281 TSZ The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: (1) Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel, docket no. 2, is 16 GRANTED. The Criminal Justice Act (“CJA”) Administrator is DIRECTED to appoint counsel to represent petitioner in connection with his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 17 (2) The Government’s motion for an order declaring petitioner’s attorney-client 18 privilege waived, docket no. 9, is RENOTED to May 26, 2017. Any response by counsel appointed to represent petitioner shall be filed by May 22, 2017. Any reply shall be due 19 on the new noting date. (3) Petitioner’s § 2255 motion, docket no. 1, is RENOTED to July 7, 2017. The Government’s answer to the § 2255 motion shall be filed within thirty-five (35) days 21 after the Court rules on the Government’s motion concerning attorney-client privilege waiver. 22 20 23 MINUTE ORDER - 1 1 (4) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of record, to petitioner pro se, to J. Gregory Lockwood (petitioner’s former counsel of 2 record in the criminal proceeding), and to the CJA Administrator. 3 Dated this 7th day of April, 2017. 4 William M. McCool Clerk 5 s/Karen Dews Deputy Clerk 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 MINUTE ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?