Stroh v. Saturna Capital Corporation et al

Filing 137

MINUTE ORDER striking hearing concerning motions in limine scheduled for 6/2/2017 at 9:00 a.m. Counsel shall instead be prepared to address any pending motions in limine at the Pretrial Conference scheduled for 6/9/2017, at 10:00 a.m. In response to plaintiff's motions in limine, defendants for the first time raise arguments concerning the scope of protection afforded by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. Plaintiff to f ile suppl. brief on these issues by 9:00 a.m. on 6/6/2017. Also by 9:00 a.m. on 6/6/2017, defendants shall file a supplemental brief addressing why they did not present these issues earlier and why they failed to file their response to plaintiff's motions in limine and supporting materials under seal as directed by the Court. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 3 4 GORDON SCOTT STROH, 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 8 C16-283 TSZ v. SATURNA CAPITAL CORPORATION, et al., MINUTE ORDER Defendants. 9 10 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: 11 (1) The hearing concerning motions in limine scheduled for June 2, 2017, at 9:00 a.m., is STRICKEN. Counsel shall instead be prepared to address any pending 12 motions in limine at the Pretrial Conference scheduled for June 9, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 (2) In response to plaintiff’s motions in limine, defendants for the first time raise arguments concerning the scope of protection afforded by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. See Defs.’ Resp. at § VI (docket no. 133). By 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, June 6, 2017, plaintiff shall file a supplemental brief, not to exceed twelve (12) pages in length, addressing such issues. Also by 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, June 6, 2017, defendants shall file a supplemental brief, not to exceed three (3) pages in length, addressing why they did not present these issues earlier and why they failed to file their response to plaintiff’s motions in limine and supporting materials under seal as directed by the Court. See Minutes (docket no. 132). No further briefs on these subjects shall be filed unless requested by the Court. (3) record. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of 20 Dated this 30th day of May, 2017. 21 William M. McCool Clerk 22 s/Karen Dews Deputy Clerk 23 MINUTE ORDER - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?