Stroh v. Saturna Capital Corporation et al
Filing
220
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendants' 219 Motion for Redaction; re 206 Notice of Filing of Official Transcript, 207 Notice of Filing of Official Transcript, 212 Notice of Filing of Official Transcript. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(SWT)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
4
5
6
GORDON SCOTT STROH,
Plaintiff,
7
C16-283 TSZ
v.
8
9
SATURNA CAPITAL
CORPORATION, et al.,
10
11
12
MINUTE ORDER
Defendants.
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge:
(1)
Defendants’ motion for redaction, docket no. 219, is GRANTED in part
13 and DENIED in part. To the extent that defendants seek to redact colloquies between the
Court and counsel conducted, or offers of proof made, outside the presence of the jury,
14 regarding matters about which defendants claim an attorney-client privilege, the motion
is GRANTED. To the extent that defendants seek to redact the testimony of witnesses or
15 statements of attorneys heard by the jury during the course of trial, defendants’ motion is
DENIED. Redacted versions of trial transcripts, omitting the portions designated below,
16 shall be filed on or after the dates set for release of any restriction on such transcripts.
The following excerpts shall be redacted:
17
Day 1 (June 16, 2017)
18
108:22-109:18
111:16-21
19
112:5-12
20
21
22
Day 2 (June 19, 2017)
406:9-24
407:17-408:1
410:25-411:1
411:6-9
413:5-414:2
23
MINUTE ORDER - 1
1
Day 7 (June 26, 2017)
1291:20-1292:7
2
(2)
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of
3 record and to Court Reporter Andrea Ramirez.
4
Dated this 21st day of November, 2017.
5
William M. McCool
Clerk
6
s/Karen Dews
Deputy Clerk
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
MINUTE ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?