Donald B. Murphy Contractors Inc. v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company
Filing
24
ORDER continuing stay pending resolution of the underlying lawsuit; Joint Status Report due by 10/23/2017, by Judge James L. Robart. (RS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
DONALD B. MURPHY
CONTRACTORS, INC.,
CASE NO. C16-0329JLR
ORDER CONTINUING STAY
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
v.
INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendant.
15
16
On December 13, 2016, the court granted the parties’ stipulated motion to stay this
17
suit pending resolution of the underlying case that is the subject of this insurance
18
coverage litigation. (Stay Ord. (Dkt. # 22).) The parties represented to the court that they
19
had reached a tentative settlement agreement involving Plaintiff Donald B. Murphy
20
Contractors, Inc. (“DBM”) releasing its claims against Defendant Indian Harbor
21
Insurance Company (“Indian Harbor”) and the parties agreeing to stay this lawsuit
22
pending resolution of the underlying case. (Stip. (Dkt. # 21) at 1.) On May 18, 2017, the
ORDER - 1
1
parties filed a joint status report stating that the trial in the underlying matter was
2
continued from April 24, 2017, to the week of September 18, 2017, but agreeing that the
3
court should maintain the stay of this litigation. (JSR (Dkt. # 23) at 1.) Accordingly, the
4
court ORDERS that this case remain stayed pending resolution of the underlying lawsuit.
5
The court ORDERS the parties to file a joint status report within seven days of the
6
outcome of the trial, dismissal, summary disposition, settlement, or other resolution of the
7
underlying matter, but in any event no later than October 23, 2017. Any party may seek
8
to lift or modify the stay if changed circumstances warrant lifting or modifying the stay.
9
Dated this 23rd day of May, 2017.
10
11
A
12
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?