Rische v United States

Filing 34

ORDER GRANTING PLAINITIFF'S 33 UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DEADLINE, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. Plaintiff's 31 MOTION for Summary Judgment , and defendant's 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment are RENOTED for 3/3/2017. (KERR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 JEFFREY ALAN RISCHE, 10 11 12 13 Plaintiff, NO. C16-339RSL vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM A DEADLINE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Based on plaintiff’s Motion and the agreement of the parties, it is hereby, ORDERED that plaintiff’s response to defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. # 30, shall be filed on or before Monday, February 27, 2017; defendant’s reply shall be filed on or before Friday, March 3, 2017. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s reply to defendant’s response to his Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. # 31, shall be filed on or before Friday, March 3, 2017. The Clerk of Court is directed to renote defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment at Dkt. # 30 and plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment at Dkt. # 31 to March 3, 2017. 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM A DEADLINE 1 DATED this 22nd day of February, 2017. 2 3 4 5 A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM A DEADLINE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?