Davis v. King County et al
Filing
44
ORDER granting 43 Stipulated Motion to set a briefing schedule; dfts' 39 MOTION for Summary Judgment is renoted for 4/28/17 by Hon. James P. Donohue.(RS) cc plaintiff
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
NO. C16-383-RAJ-JPD
TOMMIE LEE DAVIS,
9
Plaintiff,
10
v.
11
12
KING COUNTY, and JOHN DOES 1-10,
13
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
MOTION TO SET A BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
Defendants.
14
This matter comes before the Court upon the parties’ February 27, 2017 Stipulated
15
16
Motion to Set a Briefing Schedule for the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Dkt.
17
43. Defendants already filed their motion for summary judgment on February 23, 2017. Dkt.
18
39.
19
After careful consideration of parties’ stipulated motion, the governing law, and the
20
balance of the record, the Court hereby GRANTS the parties’ stipulated motion, Dkt. 43, and
21
AMENDS the briefing schedule previously set by the Court as follows:
22
23
(1) Plaintiff’s opposition/cross-motion for partial summary judgment is due by no later
than March 20, 2017;
24
(2) Defendants’ reply/opposition brief is due by no later than April 17, 2017; and
25
(3) Plaintiff’s reply is due by no later than April 28, 2017.
26
ORDER- 1
1
The Clerk of Court is directed to RE-NOTE defendants’ motion for summary
2
judgment, Dkt. 39, for consideration on April 28, 2017. The Clerk is further directed to send a
3
copy of this Order to counsel for both parties and the Honorable Richard A. Jones.
4
DATED this 2nd day of March, 2017.
A
5
6
JAMES P. DONOHUE
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER- 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?