Baker v. Microsoft Corporation et al

Filing 157

JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendants. This judgment disposes of all claims and counterclaims before the Court. Signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (PM)

THE HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

8
9

RICHARD J. BAKER.,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12
13

Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-00396
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

v.
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

16

Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Microsoft Corporation, Electronic Arts Inc.,

17

Harmonix Music Systems, Inc., Majesco Entertainment Co., Ubisoft Inc., and Nintendo of

18

America Inc.’s (collectively “Defendants”) on Plaintiff Richard J. Baker’s (“Baker”) claims for

19

infringement pursuant to the Court’s ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

20

SUMMARY JUDGMENT (D.I. 135) dated January 3, 2017 and filed on January 4, 2017. Baker

21

shall take nothing on his claims against Defendants and his claims against Defendants are

22

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

23

Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Microsoft Corporation, Electronic Arts, Inc.,

24

Majesco Entertainment Co., and Nintendo of America Inc. on their counterclaims for declarations

25

of noninfringement pursuant to that same ruling as follows: Claims 1-5, 10-15, and 18-20 of United

26

States Patent Number 5,486,001 are not infringed, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.

27

Defendants Microsoft Corporation, Electronic Arts, Inc., Majesco Entertainment Co., and
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT - 1
Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-00396
16-396.Baker judgment

1

Nintendo of America Inc.’s counterclaims for declaratory judgement of invalidity are

2

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

3
4

Defendants are not liable for infringement of any of the asserted claims and are prevailing
parties in this litigation.

5

All relief not specifically granted herein is hereby denied. All pending motions not

6

previously ruled on are hereby denied. This judgment thus disposes of all claims and counterclaims

7

before the Court. This is a final, appealable judgment. The Court retains jurisdiction solely with

8

respect to requests for costs and fees.

9
10

DATED this 16th day of June, 2017.

11
12

A

13
14

The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT - 2
Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-00396
16-396.Baker judgment