Hawkins v. United States of America et al

Filing 64

STIPUATLION AND ORDER re Parties' 63 Stipulated MOTION Amending Case Schedules. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Trial Date is continued, and an Amended Case Schedule will be set by the Court per its current calendar. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (LH)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-00498-JLR Document 64 Filed 02/06/23 Page 1 of 5 The Honorable James L. Robart 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 SABELITA HAWKINS Plaintiff v. Case No. 2:16-cv-00498-JLR JLR JOINT STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULES UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 The Plaintiff, Sabelita Hawkins (“Plaintiff” or “Hawkins”), and the Defendants, United States of America, et al (“Defendants”) by and through their respective counsel of record, jointly submit the following Stipulation to continue the trial and pre-trial dates and deadlines set by the 19 Court and agree that this case can be moved to the end of the Court’s trial calendar. The parties 20 previously filed a joint status report requesting relief from the discovery deadline and a 21 22 23 24 continuance of the trial date. Dkt. 61. On January 20, 2023, the Court issued an Order stating that the Court is will ing to consider moving the Parties’ trial date to the end of its trial calendar, likely in the summer of 2024. Dkt. 62. The Court noted that if it moves this matter to the end of 25 its trial calendar, the Court will also issue a new scheduling order with respect to all unexpired 26 pretrial deadlines. Id. The Court directed the parties to file a stipulated motion if they wish to 27 seek this relief. Id. The parties hereby jointly stipulate and respectfully request this relief 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULES PAGE 1 OF 5 Case 2:16-cv-00498-JLR Document 64 Filed 02/06/23 Page 2 of 5 The Stipulation is made pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(b). The Parties 1 2 recently discovered additional treatment providers of the Plaintiff, Ms. Sabelita Hawkins, which 3 were not previously disclosed in 2016. The United States will need to collect and review the 4 5 6 7 records of these additional treatment providers. Additionally, the parties will also need to update the damage discovery following the receipt of these records. For all these reasons the parties set out a proposal and request an extension of the current case schedule. I. 8 9 10 11 12 SYNOPSIS OF THE CASE The Ninth Circuit 1 on September 28, 2021 reversed the district court’s October 1, 2019 judgment and remanded for further proceedings. On November 22 2, 2021, a Mandate was issued in this Court. This Court entered an Order Directing a Status Report on November 23, 2021 13 within twenty-one (21) days of the Order 3. The parties filed their Joint Status Report on 14 December 12, 2021 4 requesting at least 60 days to engage in the settlement discussions or up 15 until February 14, 2022, before this Court sets a Settlement Conference. The Court granted this 16 17 18 request 5 and a Minute Order was entered stating the following: “The parties are directed to file settlement paperwork or another Joint Status Report by April 11, 2022.” This additional request 19 for time is being made to provide time for the Defendant to contact one of the Primary Care 20 Physician witnesses who is no longer with the VA Puget Sound Health Care System as well as 21 for continued settlement discussions. On April 11, 2022, the parties filed their Joint Status 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Report 6 and requested at least sixty (60) days to engage in settlement discussions or up until June 10, 2022, before this Court sets a Settlement Conference. The Court granted this request 7 and a See Docket No. 49 See Docket No. 50 3 See Docket No. 21 4 See Docket No. 52 5 See Docket No. 55 6 See Docket No. 56 7 See Docket No. 57 1 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULES PAGE 2 OF 5 Case 2:16-cv-00498-JLR Document 64 Filed 02/06/23 Page 3 of 5 1 Minute Order was entered stating the following: “The parties are directed to file settlement 2 paperwork or another Joint Status Report by June 10, 2022.” A Joint Status Report was filed on 3 June 16, 2022 by the parties and a trial date was set June 24, 2022 8. A minute order setting trial 4 date and related dates was entered by this Court on June 24, 2022 9. 5 In light of the Ninth Circuit’s Ruling the parties have conferred and request an 6 7 extension of the current discovery deadline which is currently set for February 13, 2023 and 8 extended to May 18, 2023. And an extension of the trial date which is currently set for June 12, 9 2023. 10 Pending Motions 11 There are no pending motions before this Court for this case. 12 II. 13 14 STIPULATION OF PARTIES TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL AND CORRESPONDING PRE-TRIAL DATES BASED ON GOOD FAITH The parties stipulate and agree to a continuance of the pre-trial and trial dates to some 15 16 time at the end of the Court’s trial calendar for the following reasons: (1) Parties recently 17 discovered additional treatment providers of the Plaintiff, Ms. Sabelita Hawkins, which were not 18 previously disclosed in 2016; (2) The United States will need to collect and review the records of 19 20 21 these additional treatment providers; and (3) Additionally, the parties will also need to update the damage discovery following the receipt of these records. The February 13, 2023 discovery 22 deadline does not provide the Parties sufficient time to prepare discovery and update the damage 23 discovery following the receipt of the Plaintiff’s records. 24 25 26 The parties stipulate and agree to continue the trial and pre-trial dates and deadlines set by the Court and agree to some time at the end of the Court’s trial calendar. Without this 27 28 8 9 See Docket No. 59 See Docket No. 60 JOINT STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULES PAGE 3 OF 5 Case 2:16-cv-00498-JLR Document 64 Filed 02/06/23 Page 4 of 5 1 continuance of the dates, the parties will be prejudiced. The parties have been complying with 2 the current dates and deadlines set forth in the Court’s case schedule. The parties agree to extend 3 the unexpired deadlines of the trial order. This continuance of the dates and deadlines would 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 serve to avoid any potential fees and costs, as well as waste of judicial resources and time, filing potential motions after the cut-off dates for leave to amend the scheduling order. To this end, the parties stipulate and agree to a trial continuance to some time at the end of the Court’s trial calendar. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(b) gives the Court broad discretion to regulate pretrial matters, to manage its calendar, grant continuances of scheduling dates, and to direct the parties in a manner that expedites disposition of the action and facilitates settlement. As set forth herein, good cause exists for the Court to grant the continuance under any of the Rules. IT IS SO STIUPLATED. Dated: February 3rd, 2023 Dated: February 3rd , 2023 /s/ Tuella O. Sykes` Tuella O. Sykes, WSBA No. 36179 Attorney for Plaintiff PO Box 3322 Seattle, WA 98114 P: 206-721-0086 F: 206-721-0087 E: tos@tuellasykeslaw.com /s/ Kristin B. Johnson KRISTIN B. JOHNSON, WSBA #28189 Assistant United States Attorney 700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220 Seattle, WA 98101-1271 Tel: (206) 553-7970 Fax: (206) 553-4073 E: Kristin.b.johnson@usdoj.gov 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULES PAGE 4 OF 5 Case 2:16-cv-00498-JLR Document 64 Filed 02/06/23 Page 5 of 5 ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Based on the foregoing Stipulation and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Trial Date is continued, and an Amended Case Schedule will be set by the Court per its current calendar. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 6, 2023 8 9 A 10 11 Honorable James L. Robart United States District Court Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULES PAGE 5 OF 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?