Hawkins v. United States of America et al
Filing
64
STIPUATLION AND ORDER re Parties' 63 Stipulated MOTION Amending Case Schedules. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Trial Date is continued, and an Amended Case Schedule will be set by the Court per its current calendar. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (LH)
Case 2:16-cv-00498-JLR Document 64 Filed 02/06/23 Page 1 of 5
The Honorable James L. Robart
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
SABELITA HAWKINS
Plaintiff
v.
Case No. 2:16-cv-00498-JLR
JLR
JOINT STIPULATION AND [proposed]
ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULES
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al
Defendants.
14
15
16
17
18
The Plaintiff, Sabelita Hawkins (“Plaintiff” or “Hawkins”), and the Defendants, United
States of America, et al (“Defendants”) by and through their respective counsel of record, jointly
submit the following Stipulation to continue the trial and pre-trial dates and deadlines set by the
19
Court and agree that this case can be moved to the end of the Court’s trial calendar. The parties
20
previously filed a joint status report requesting relief from the discovery deadline and a
21
22
23
24
continuance of the trial date. Dkt. 61. On January 20, 2023, the Court issued an Order stating
that the Court is will ing to consider moving the Parties’ trial date to the end of its trial calendar,
likely in the summer of 2024. Dkt. 62. The Court noted that if it moves this matter to the end of
25
its trial calendar, the Court will also issue a new scheduling order with respect to all unexpired
26
pretrial deadlines. Id. The Court directed the parties to file a stipulated motion if they wish to
27
seek this relief. Id. The parties hereby jointly stipulate and respectfully request this relief
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [proposed]
ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULES
PAGE 1 OF 5
Case 2:16-cv-00498-JLR Document 64 Filed 02/06/23 Page 2 of 5
The Stipulation is made pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(b). The Parties
1
2
recently discovered additional treatment providers of the Plaintiff, Ms. Sabelita Hawkins, which
3
were not previously disclosed in 2016. The United States will need to collect and review the
4
5
6
7
records of these additional treatment providers. Additionally, the parties will also need to update
the damage discovery following the receipt of these records. For all these reasons the parties set
out a proposal and request an extension of the current case schedule.
I.
8
9
10
11
12
SYNOPSIS OF THE CASE
The Ninth Circuit 1 on September 28, 2021 reversed the district court’s October 1, 2019
judgment and remanded for further proceedings. On November 22 2, 2021, a Mandate was issued
in this Court. This Court entered an Order Directing a Status Report on November 23, 2021
13
within twenty-one (21) days of the Order 3. The parties filed their Joint Status Report on
14
December 12, 2021 4 requesting at least 60 days to engage in the settlement discussions or up
15
until February 14, 2022, before this Court sets a Settlement Conference. The Court granted this
16
17
18
request 5 and a Minute Order was entered stating the following: “The parties are directed to file
settlement paperwork or another Joint Status Report by April 11, 2022.” This additional request
19
for time is being made to provide time for the Defendant to contact one of the Primary Care
20
Physician witnesses who is no longer with the VA Puget Sound Health Care System as well as
21
for continued settlement discussions. On April 11, 2022, the parties filed their Joint Status
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Report 6 and requested at least sixty (60) days to engage in settlement discussions or up until June
10, 2022, before this Court sets a Settlement Conference. The Court granted this request 7 and a
See Docket No. 49
See Docket No. 50
3
See Docket No. 21
4
See Docket No. 52
5
See Docket No. 55
6
See Docket No. 56
7
See Docket No. 57
1
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [proposed]
ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULES
PAGE 2 OF 5
Case 2:16-cv-00498-JLR Document 64 Filed 02/06/23 Page 3 of 5
1
Minute Order was entered stating the following: “The parties are directed to file settlement
2
paperwork or another Joint Status Report by June 10, 2022.” A Joint Status Report was filed on
3
June 16, 2022 by the parties and a trial date was set June 24, 2022 8. A minute order setting trial
4
date and related dates was entered by this Court on June 24, 2022 9.
5
In light of the Ninth Circuit’s Ruling the parties have conferred and request an
6
7
extension of the current discovery deadline which is currently set for February 13, 2023 and
8
extended to May 18, 2023. And an extension of the trial date which is currently set for June 12,
9
2023.
10
Pending Motions
11
There are no pending motions before this Court for this case.
12
II.
13
14
STIPULATION OF PARTIES TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL AND
CORRESPONDING PRE-TRIAL DATES BASED ON GOOD FAITH
The parties stipulate and agree to a continuance of the pre-trial and trial dates to some
15
16
time at the end of the Court’s trial calendar for the following reasons: (1) Parties recently
17
discovered additional treatment providers of the Plaintiff, Ms. Sabelita Hawkins, which were not
18
previously disclosed in 2016; (2) The United States will need to collect and review the records of
19
20
21
these additional treatment providers; and (3) Additionally, the parties will also need to update the
damage discovery following the receipt of these records. The February 13, 2023 discovery
22
deadline does not provide the Parties sufficient time to prepare discovery and update the damage
23
discovery following the receipt of the Plaintiff’s records.
24
25
26
The parties stipulate and agree to continue the trial and pre-trial dates and deadlines set
by the Court and agree to some time at the end of the Court’s trial calendar. Without this
27
28
8
9
See Docket No. 59
See Docket No. 60
JOINT STIPULATION AND [proposed]
ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULES
PAGE 3 OF 5
Case 2:16-cv-00498-JLR Document 64 Filed 02/06/23 Page 4 of 5
1
continuance of the dates, the parties will be prejudiced. The parties have been complying with
2
the current dates and deadlines set forth in the Court’s case schedule. The parties agree to extend
3
the unexpired deadlines of the trial order. This continuance of the dates and deadlines would
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
serve to avoid any potential fees and costs, as well as waste of judicial resources and time, filing
potential motions after the cut-off dates for leave to amend the scheduling order. To this end, the
parties stipulate and agree to a trial continuance to some time at the end of the Court’s trial
calendar.
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(b) gives the Court broad discretion to regulate pretrial matters, to manage its calendar, grant continuances of scheduling dates, and to direct the
parties in a manner that expedites disposition of the action and facilitates settlement. As set forth
herein, good cause exists for the Court to grant the continuance under any of the Rules.
IT IS SO STIUPLATED.
Dated: February 3rd, 2023
Dated: February 3rd , 2023
/s/ Tuella O. Sykes`
Tuella O. Sykes, WSBA No. 36179
Attorney for Plaintiff
PO Box 3322
Seattle, WA 98114
P: 206-721-0086
F: 206-721-0087
E: tos@tuellasykeslaw.com
/s/ Kristin B. Johnson
KRISTIN B. JOHNSON, WSBA #28189
Assistant United States Attorney
700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220
Seattle, WA 98101-1271
Tel: (206) 553-7970
Fax: (206) 553-4073
E: Kristin.b.johnson@usdoj.gov
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [proposed]
ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULES
PAGE 4 OF 5
Case 2:16-cv-00498-JLR Document 64 Filed 02/06/23 Page 5 of 5
ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Based on the foregoing Stipulation and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that the Trial Date is continued, and an Amended Case Schedule will be set by the
Court per its current calendar.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 6, 2023
8
9
A
10
11
Honorable James L. Robart
United States District Court Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [proposed]
ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULES
PAGE 5 OF 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?