Daimler AG v Amazon.com Inc

Filing 41

**AMENDED** ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND RELATED DATES re: 40 Stipulated Motion. Jury Trial is set for 8/19/2019 at 09:00 AM before Judge Ricardo S. Martinez, Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 2/19/2019, Discovery motions due 3/21/2019; Discovery completed by 4/22/2019, Dispositive motions due by 5/20/2019, 39.1 mediation to be completed by 7/5/2019, Motions in Limine due by 7/22/2019, Agreed Pretrial Order due by 8/6/2019, Voir dire/jury instructions/trial briefs /trial exhibits due by 8/14/2019. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 10 No. C16-518 RSM DAIMLER AG, Plaintiff, v. 11 12 13 STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER AMAZON.COM, INC., Defendant. 14 15 Pursuant to LCR 10(g), Plaintiff Daimler AG (“Daimler”) and Defendant Amazon.com, 16 Inc. (“Amazon”) respectfully stipulate and jointly move the Court to amend the Order Setting 17 Trial Date and Related Deadlines (Dkt. No. 39) (“Scheduling Order”) by extending the trial date 18 and modifying the preceding dates, as noted below. This is the second time the parties have 19 requested an extension. 20 The parties respectfully submit that good cause exists for the proposed amendments to 21 the schedule. Daimler and Amazon are presently negotiating the final terms of a settlement 22 agreement that encompasses this proceeding, as well as a trademark infringement action between 23 the parties in the Central District of California (Case No. 2:17-cv-07674). Accordingly, the 24 parties anticipate finalizing their settlement and filing appropriate dismissal paperwork well 25 within the requested extension time of 90 days. In light of the progress made towards settlement, 26 the parties believe that a 90-day extension of all deadlines would allow them to finalize the LAW OFFICES OF STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER - 1 (2:16-cv-00518-RSM) NICOLL BLACK & FEIG PLLC 1325 FOURTH AVENUE SUITE 1650 S E A T T L E , W A S H I N G T O N 98101 (206) 838-7555 1 settlement and dismiss this case, or if the settlement is not finalized, finish preparing their 2 respective cases for trial. Such an extension would allow the parties to avoid the unnecessary 3 expenditure of time and resources and focus on resolving this matter without the need to burden 4 the Court further. 5 Daimler and Amazon, after conferring, agree that given the scope and status of the case 6 and the settlement negotiations, a 90-day extension of the trial date and modification to the 7 case schedule is warranted. 8 A proposed amended case schedule is set forth below. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 JURY TRIAL DATE August 19, 2019 or later at the Court’s convenience Deadline for disclosure of expert testimony under FRCP 26(a)(2) February 19, 2019 Deadline for filing motions related to discovery. March 21, 2019 Any such motions shall be noted for consideration pursuant to LCR 7(d)(3) Discovery completed by April 22, 2019 All dispositive motions must be filed by and noted on the motion calendar no later than the fourth Friday thereafter (see LCR 7(d)) May 20, 2019 Mediation per LCR 39.1(c)(3) held no later than July 5, 2019 July 22, 2019 21 All motions in limine must be filed by and noted on the motion calendar for the third Friday thereafter pursuant to LCR 7(d) 22 Agreed pretrial order due August 6, 2019 23 Pretrial conference to be scheduled by the Court. 16 17 18 19 20 24 25 26 Trial briefs, proposed voir dire questions, jury August 14, 2019 instructions, neutral statement of the case, and LAW OFFICES OF STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER - 2 (2:16-cv-00518-RSM) NICOLL BLACK & FEIG PLLC 1325 FOURTH AVENUE SUITE 1650 S E A T T L E , W A S H I N G T O N 98101 (206) 838-7555 1 2 trial exhibits due DATED: November 19, 2018 3 4 5 6 By: s/ Larry Altenbrun Larry E. Altenbrun, WSBA No. 31475 Nicoll Black & Feig 1325 Fourth Ave., Suite 1650 Seattle, WA 98101 Tel: (206) 838-7555 Fax: (206) 838-7515 7 THE MARBURY LAW GROUP, PLLC Shauna M. Wertheim Timothy W. Johnson Joanna L. Cohn 11800 Sunrise Valley Drive, 15th Fl. Reston, Virginia 20191 Telephone: (703) 391-2900 Facsimile: (703) 391-2901 swertheim@marburylaw.com tjohnson@marburylaw.com jcohn@marburylaw.com Pro Hac Vice Counsel 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff Daimler AG 16 17 DATED: November 19, 2018 18 19 20 21 22 23 By: s/ Lane M. Polozola Grant E. Kinsel (WSBA 49576) Lane M. Polozola (WSBA 50138) PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Telephone: 206.359.8000 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 Email: GKinsel@perkinscoie.com Email: LPolozola@perkinscoie.com Attorneys for Defendant Amazon.com, Inc. 24 25 26 // LAW OFFICES OF STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER - 3 (2:16-cv-00518-RSM) NICOLL BLACK & FEIG PLLC 1325 FOURTH AVENUE SUITE 1650 S E A T T L E , W A S H I N G T O N 98101 (206) 838-7555 1 For good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of November 2018. A 2 3 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 5 6 7 Presented by: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Larry E. Altenbrun, WSBA No. 31475 NICOLL BLACK & FEIG PLLC 1325 FOURTH AVENUE SUITE 1650 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Telephone: (206) 838-7555 Facsimile: (206) 383-7515 laltenbrun@nicollblack.com Shauna M. Wertheim, Pro Hac Vice Timothy W. Johnson, Pro Hac Vice Joanna L. Cohn, Pro Hac Vice THE MARBURY LAW GROUP, PLLC 11800 Sunrise Valley Drive, 15th Floor Reston, Virginia 20191 Telephone: (703) 391-2900 Facsimile: (703) 391-2901 swertheim@marburylaw.com tjohnson@marburylaw.com jcohn@marburylaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Daimler AG 23 24 25 26 LAW OFFICES OF STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER - 4 (2:16-cv-00518-RSM) NICOLL BLACK & FEIG PLLC 1325 FOURTH AVENUE SUITE 1650 S E A T T L E , W A S H I N G T O N 98101 (206) 838-7555

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?