LHF Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al
Filing
58
MINUTE ORDER striking as moot plaintiff's 54 Motion for Extension of Time by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS) (Main Document 58 replaced on 4/14/2017) (RS).
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
10
11
LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
12
13
Case No. C16-552 RSM
MINUTE ORDER
v.
DOE 1, et al.,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Defendants.
The following MINUTE ORDER is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
Ricardo S. Martinez, Chief United States District Judge:
On March 17, 2017, Plaintiff LHF Productions, Inc. (“LHF”) filed a Motion for
Extension of Time to File Joint Notice of Appeal. Dkt. #54. Despite filing its motion for
21
extension of time, LHF filed a Notice of Civil Appeal on the same day. See Dkt. #55. Pursuant
22
to Rule 4(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, in a civil case a notice of
23
appeal “must be filed with the district clerk within 30 days after entry of the judgment or order
24
appealed from.” Here, the Court entered the Order LHF seeks to appeal on February 15, 2017.
25
26
See Dkts. #51 and #52. Consequently, LHF had until March 17, 2017, to file its Notice of
27
Appeal. Because LHF timely filed its appeal in the Ninth Circuit, the Court STRIKES LHF’s
28
Motion for Extension of Time to File Joint Notice of Appeal as MOOT.
MINUTE ORDER - 1
1
2
3
DATED this 14th day of April, 2017.
4
WILLIAM McCOOL, Clerk
5
By: /s/ Rhonda Stiles
Deputy Clerk
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MINUTE ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?