A.J., et al v. City of Bellingham et al
Filing
73
MINUTE ORDER setting deadline of 7/14/2017 for Plaintiffs to sufficiently address the show cause order 69 . Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (PM)
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
A.J., et al.,
10
11
12
13
CASE NO. C16-0620-JCC
Plaintiffs,
MINUTE ORDER
v.
CITY OF BELLINGHAM, et al.,
Defendants.
14
15
16
17
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C.
Coughenour, United States District Judge:
This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On April 24, 2017, the Court ordered
18
Plaintiffs to show cause why their claims against Defendants R. Chavez, Doe #1, and Chris
19
Bippley should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Dkt. No. 69 at 1.) Plaintiffs were
20
directed to respond to the show cause order prior to the status conference set for May 2, 2017, or
21
to come to the status conference prepared to address this issue. (Id. at 1-2.) Plaintiffs submitted
22
no response and it does not appear Plaintiffs raised the issue at the status conference. (See Dkt.
23
No. 70.) More than two months later, no further action has been taken to prosecute the claims.
24
Plaintiffs’ counsel is unavailable through Tuesday, July 11, 2017. (Dkt. No. 71 at 1.)
25
Accordingly, the Court gives Plaintiffs until Friday, July 14, 2017 to sufficiently address the
26
show cause order (Dkt. No. 69). If Plaintiffs fail to do so, the claims against the
MINUTE ORDER C16-0620-JCC
PAGE - 1
1
aforementioned Defendants will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. No extension of this
2
deadline shall be permitted.
3
DATED this 5th day of July 2017.
4
William M. McCool
Clerk of Court
5
s/Paula McNabb
Deputy Clerk
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
MINUTE ORDER C16-0620-JCC
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?