Bailey v. Alpha Technologies Incorporated et al

Filing 132

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 129 Motion to Stay Execution of Judgment. Execution of the judgment against Plaintiff (Dkt. No. 116 ) is STAYED pending Plaintiff's appeal. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)

Download PDF
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 YVETTE BAILEY, 10 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 11 12 CASE NO. C16-0727-JCC ALPHA TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion to stay execution of judgment (Dkt. No. 129). Plaintiff requests to stay execution of the judgment entered against her for $7,515.85. (Dkt. No. 116.) The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s motion to deposit $10,000 in the Court’s registry in lieu of a supersedeas bond. (Dkt. No. 128.) On May 4, 2018, Plaintiff deposited $10,000 in the Court registry. (Dkt. No. 130.) Based on this deposit, Defendants do not oppose Plaintiff’s present motion to stay of execution of judgment. (Dkt. No. 131.) The Court therefore GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion (Dkt. No. 129). Execution of the judgment against Plaintiff (Dkt. No. 116) is STAYED pending Plaintiff’s appeal. // // // ORDER C16-0727-JCC PAGE - 1 1 DATED this 22nd day of May 2018. A 2 3 4 John C. Coughenour UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER C16-0727-JCC PAGE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?