Rodriguez v. Hemit et al

Filing 68

ORDER denying Plaintiff's 61 Motion for Reconsideration signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (TH)

1

HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES

2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

5
6

7 JERARDO RODRIGUEZ,
8
9
10

Plaintiff,
v.
SOHI HEMIT, et al.,

11

Defendants.

12
13

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. C16-778-RAJ
ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration. Dkt.

14 # 61. Motions for reconsideration are disfavored and will be granted only upon a “showing
15 of manifest error in the prior ruling” or “new facts or legal authority which could not have
16 been brought to [the court’s] attention earlier with reasonable diligence.” Local R. W.D.
17

Wash. LCR 7(h)(1).
In his motion, Plaintiff reiterates the arguments and concerns he expressed in his

18

motion to compel. Dkt. # 46. He does not raise new arguments offer new evidence.
19
20

Accordingly, the Court DENIES the motion for reconsideration. Dkt. # 61.
Dated this 6th day of April, 2018.

21

A

22
23

The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge
ORDER-1