Casper v. Colvin

Filing 25

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 22 Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 8 ANDREW JAMES CASPER, Plaintiff, 9 10 11 v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 12 Defendant. 13 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C16-886-RSL ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EAJA FEES This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiff’s unopposed motion for attorney fees 15 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Dkt. 22. The Commissioner 16 “found no basis to object” to the requested attorney fees. Dkt. 24. Accordingly, the Court 17 ORDERS that plaintiff’s unopposed motion, Dkt. 22, is GRANTED, and that EAJA fees in the 18 amount of $5,310.24 be awarded to plaintiff pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S.Ct. 19 2521, 2531-2, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010) and delivered to plaintiff’s counsel, John-Paul Gustad. 20 However, if the U.S. Department of the Treasury verifies to the Office of General Counsel that 21 plaintiff does not owe a debt, the government shall honor plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA Fees 22 and pay EAJA fees directly to John-Paul Gustad. 23 24 ORDER PAGE - 1 1 DATED this 17th day of August, 2017. 2 3 4 A Robert S. Lasnik 5 United States District Judge 6 7   8 9 Recommended for entry this 17th day of August, 2017. 10 11 s/ JAMES P. DONOHUE Chief United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER PAGE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?