Bund v. Safeguard Properties LLC

Filing 206

REVISED ORDER on Pending Motions. IT IS ORDERED that the parties will meet and confer as to whether the motions at Dkt. No. 167 and Dkt. No. 184 are still necessary for the Court to rule upon; this meeting shall be held no later than January 26. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within two days business following the meet and confer, the parties are to submit to the Court (1) an outline of the motions remaining to be filed in order for this case to be developed for trial and (2) a schedule of those motions. The order previously entered (Dkt. No. 205 ) is stricken. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (TH)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

8
9
10

JOHN R. BUND II, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

11

REVISED ORDER ON PENDING
MOTIONS

v.

12
13

CASE NO. C16-920 MJP

SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES LLC,
Defendant.

14
15
16
17
18

At the request of counsel, the Court amends the order previously entered (Dkt. No. 205)
as follows:
On January 12, 2018, the Court entered a summary judgment order dismissing the

19

Hanousek plaintiffs from this case (Dkt. No. 203) and an order partially granting Plaintiffs’

20

motion for class certification (Dkt. No. 204).

21

There are two motions still pending in this matter:

22

1. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Withdraw and/or Amend Deemed Admissions (Dkt. No. 167),

23

and

24

REVISED ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS - 1

1

2. Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File Under LCR 7(e)(3) (Dkt. No. 184).

2

The above-noted rulings may impact the materiality of the still-pending motions. With

3
4

that in mind,
IT IS ORDERED that the parties will meet and confer as to whether the motions at Dkt.

5

No. 167 and Dkt. No. 184 are still necessary for the Court to rule upon; this meeting shall be held

6

no later than January 26.

7

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within two days business following the meet and

8

confer, the parties are to submit to the Court (1) an outline of the motions remaining to be filed in

9

order for this case to be developed for trial and (2) a schedule of those motions.

10
11

If, following the meet and confer, the parties require a status conference with the Court,
they may contact chambers.

12
13
14
15

The order previously entered (Dkt. No. 205) is stricken. The clerk is ordered to provide
copies of this revised order to all counsel.
Dated January 17, 2018.

17

A

18

Marsha J. Pechman
United States District Judge

16

19
20
21
22
23
24

REVISED ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS - 2