Bund v. Safeguard Properties LLC

Filing 371

ORDER denying Defendant's 370 Motion for Leave to File Overllength Brief. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-00920-MJP Document 371 Filed 12/07/20 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 JOHN R. BUND II, et al., Plaintiffs, 11 CASE NO. C16-920 MJP ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO FILE OVERLENGTH BRIEF v. 12 SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES LLC, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 Defendant filed a motion asking for leave to file an overlength brief. (Dkt. No. 370.) 17 Defendant believes that the Court’s scheduling order permits it to file both a motion for summary 18 judgment and a separate motion addressing the typicality and adequacy of the named plaintiffs. 19 (Id.) The Court made no such allowance. Defendant was given a deadline by which to file a 20 single motion for summary judgment that could also address typicality and adequacy. Per the 21 Local Rules, Defendant may file only one brief of no more than 24 pages to support its summary 22 judgment motion, including any challenge to typicality and adequacy. See Local Rule 7(e)(3). 23 \\ 24 ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO FILE OVERLENGTH BRIEF - 1 Case 2:16-cv-00920-MJP Document 371 Filed 12/07/20 Page 2 of 2 1 The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel. 2 Dated December 7, 2020. 3 A 4 Marsha J. Pechman United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO FILE OVERLENGTH BRIEF - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?