Williams v. ARStrat, LLC

Filing 10

ORDER dismissing action with prejudice and without costs per 9 Stipulation. Signed by Chief Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 9 10 AMANDA WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 vs. ARSTRAT, LLC Defendant 15 ) No.: C16-971 RSM ) ) ) ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH ) PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 16 17 BEFORE THE COURT is the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice 18 and Without Costs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, all claims 19 and causes of action against Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff and 20 21 22 Defendant shall each bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day May 2017. 23 A 24 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27 28 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS Case No. 2:16-cv-00971 RSM Marina Dzhamilova, Esq. 6628 212th St., Ste 206 Lynnwood, WA 98036 1 2 3 4 Dated this 16th day of May, 2017 at Lynnwood, Washington. /s/ Marina Dzhamilova Marina Dzhamilova Attorney for Plaintiff 5 6 7 8 9 Dated this 16th day of May, 2017 at Portland, Oregon. /s/ Andrew D. Shafer Andrew D. Shafer (WSBA #9405) Attorney for Defendant 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS Case No. 2:16-cv-00971 RSM Marina Dzhamilova, Esq. 6628 212th St., Ste 206 Lynnwood, WA 98036

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?