Khazali v. King County Court of the Washington State

Filing 18

ORDER denying plaintiff's 15 Motion filed on 7/13/17 signed by Chief Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS) cc plaintiff

1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

7
8
9
10

MASOUD KHAZALI,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15
16

Case No. C16-1021JLR
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FILED ON JULY 13, 2017

v.
KING COUNTY COURT OF
WASHINGTON STATE,
Defendant.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Masoud Khazali’s “Motion, Time and

17
18

Space.” Dkt. #15. This Motion was filed on July 13, 2017, nearly a year since the previous

19

filings, the Order and Judgment dismissing this case with prejudice. See Docket. This instant

20

Motion was referred to the undersigned judge via Order dated July 27, 2017. Dkt. #17.

21
22
23
24

On its face, this Motion does not cite to any rule or law, nor does it clearly state what
relief it requests from the Court. See Dkt. #15. Mr. Khazali begins by stating, as if by
epigraph, “Not allowed into Your Space… To appeal the case…” Id. at 1. In the body of his

25

Motion, Mr. Khazali says that he “was not allowed into Your Space to file the motion on time,”

26

but does not identify the motion to which he refers. Id. at 1. Mr. Khazali states that he was in a

27

coma, “was made not to hold an ID,” and apparently could not enter the courthouse at some

28

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FILED ON JULY 13, 2017- 1

1
2

time because he lacked identification. Id. Mr. Khazali, speaking to the Court, states “[y]ou
made me be lost in Time.” Id.

3

Plaintiff includes the following attachments to his Motion: “The Kidnap Loving State,”

4

which provides a sort of history of slavery in the United States; “The State of the Claim,”

5
6
7

which provides some procedural background, “Life: the Live Connection through Space,”
which engages in a metaphysical discussion of “invisible energy” and “hidden life in light;”

8

“The Immune Executioner,” which discusses injury to the Plaintiff, including Plaintiff “los[ing]

9

his mind,” caused by the separation of Plaintiff from his child; “Prevention of Abuse,” broadly

10
11
12

discussing his case; “Valuing Property over Humanity,” which accuses the Court of continuing
historic practices of slavery; and “The Masters’ Court,” which accuses the Honorable James L.

13

Robart, United States District Judge, of supporting terrorism, child abuse, slavery, and gender

14

and racial inequality because of Judge Robart’s vague associations with the nation’s first

15

president George Washington. See id. at 2-14.

16

The Court is not required to guess, without any reasonable basis, what relief a plaintiff

17
18

is requesting in a Motion such as this. If Mr. Khazali is requesting relief from some deadline

19

by stating reasons why he was unable to file a document at an earlier time, the Court finds that

20

he has failed to present sufficient evidence of good cause for granting relief as to any prior

21

filing. Pursuant to this Court’s Local Rules, “[a] motion for relief from a deadline should,

22
23
24

whenever possible, be filed sufficiently in advance of the deadline to allow the court to rule on
the motion prior to the deadline.” LCR 7(j). “Parties should not assume that the motion will be

25

granted and must comply with the existing deadline unless the court orders otherwise.” Id. Mr.

26

Khazali has presented no reasonable basis for interpreting this Motion as requesting any other

27

relief, or under any other rule or law.

28

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FILED ON JULY 13, 2017- 2

1

Having reviewed the relevant briefing and the remainder of the record, the Court hereby

2

finds and ORDERS that Plaintiff’s Motion filed on July 13, 2017, is DENIED. Plaintiff is not

3

granted relief from any deadline. The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff at

4

14324 32ND AVE NE, APT D, SEATTLE, WA 98125.

5
6
7
8
9
10

DATED this 31 day of July, 2017.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FILED ON JULY 13, 2017- 3