Lohr v. Nissan North America, Inc et al
Filing
189
ORDER granting Defendant's 182 Motion to Seal. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez.(SB)
1
THE HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
9
10
11
12
13
TAMARA LOHR and RAVIKIRAN SINDOGI,
on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated,
v.
Case No. 2:16-CV-01023 RSM
CLASS ACTION
ORDER GRANTING NNA’S
MOTION TO SEAL
Plaintiffs,
14
15
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., and
NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
Pursuant to Local Rule 5(g), NNA filed a motion to seal its Suggestions in Reply to
20
its Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Thomas Read. Upon due consideration, and
21
good cause appearing, the Court grants Plaintiffs’ Motion to Seal as follows:
22
23
24
Exhibit
No.
Ex. A
Title of Document
NNA’s
Suggestions in
Reply to its
Sealed /
Redacted
(Page/Line)
Redacted
6:1-4.
Reason for
Sealing
NNA’s
confidential and
proprietary
Court’s
Ruling
Granted
ORDER
CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-01023 RSM
4893-9620-8897 v1
Exhibit
No.
1
Title of Document
2
Sealed /
Redacted
(Page/Line)
Motion to Exclude
the Testimony of
Dr. Thomas Read
3
Reason for
Sealing
Court’s
Ruling
testing data and
analysis.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 5th day of November, 2021.
8
9
10
A
11
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-01023 RSM
4893-9620-8897 v1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?