Lohr v. Nissan North America, Inc et al

Filing 189

ORDER granting Defendant's 182 Motion to Seal. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez.(SB)

Download PDF
  1 THE HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 10 11 12 13 TAMARA LOHR and RAVIKIRAN SINDOGI, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Case No. 2:16-CV-01023 RSM CLASS ACTION ORDER GRANTING NNA’S MOTION TO SEAL Plaintiffs, 14 15 NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., and NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Pursuant to Local Rule 5(g), NNA filed a motion to seal its Suggestions in Reply to 20 its Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Thomas Read. Upon due consideration, and 21 good cause appearing, the Court grants Plaintiffs’ Motion to Seal as follows: 22 23 24 Exhibit No. Ex. A Title of Document NNA’s Suggestions in Reply to its Sealed / Redacted (Page/Line) Redacted 6:1-4. Reason for Sealing NNA’s confidential and proprietary Court’s Ruling Granted ORDER CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-01023 RSM 4893-9620-8897 v1   Exhibit No. 1 Title of Document 2 Sealed / Redacted (Page/Line) Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Thomas Read 3 Reason for Sealing Court’s Ruling testing data and analysis. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 5th day of November, 2021. 8 9 10 A 11 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14   15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-01023 RSM 4893-9620-8897 v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?