Lohr v. Nissan North America, Inc et al

Filing 194

ORDER granting Defendant's 191 Motion to Seal. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-01023-RSM Document 194 Filed 12/13/21 Page 1 of 2 1 THE HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 11 12 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TAMARA LOHR and RAVIKIRAN SINDOGI, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 13 14 15 Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 2:16-cv-01023 RSM ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.’S MOTION TO SEAL NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., and NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-01023 RSM 4864-2359-0149 v1 Case 2:16-cv-01023-RSM Document 194 Filed 12/13/21 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Pursuant to Local Rule 5(g), Defendant Nissan North America, Inc. (“NNA”) filed a motion to seal. Upon due consideration, and good cause appearing, the Court grants NNA’s Motion to Seal as follows: Exhibit Title of No. Document Motion for Summary Judgment Sealed / Redacted (Page/Line Redacted 7:258:1. 8 9 10 11 12 Motion for Summary Judgment 13 14 15 16 Redacted 9:2127; 19:19-21; 19:25-20:1. Reason for Sealing Court’s Ruling NNA’s confidential and proprietary testing data and analysis by Dr. Paul Verghese. Disclosure of this information would allow competitors to gain an unfair competitive advantage to NNA’s detriment. Latta Decl., Dkt. 113-1 ¶¶ 6-11. NNA’s confidential and proprietary testing data, analysis, and warranty claims data by Dr. Jeya Padmanaban. Disclosure of this information would allow competitors to gain an unfair competitive advantage to NNA’s detriment. Latta Decl., Dkt. 113-1 ¶¶ 6-11. GRANTED GRANTED 17 18 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 13th day of December, 2021. 21 A 22 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-01023 RSM 4864-2359-0149 v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?