Lohr v. Nissan North America, Inc et al
Filing
194
ORDER granting Defendant's 191 Motion to Seal. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)
Case 2:16-cv-01023-RSM Document 194 Filed 12/13/21 Page 1 of 2
1
THE HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
11
12
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
TAMARA LOHR and RAVIKIRAN SINDOGI,
on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated,
13
14
15
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. 2:16-cv-01023 RSM
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT NISSAN
NORTH AMERICA, INC.’S MOTION TO
SEAL
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., and
NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER
CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-01023 RSM
4864-2359-0149 v1
Case 2:16-cv-01023-RSM Document 194 Filed 12/13/21 Page 2 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Pursuant to Local Rule 5(g), Defendant Nissan North America, Inc. (“NNA”) filed a
motion to seal.
Upon due consideration, and good cause appearing, the Court grants NNA’s Motion to Seal
as follows:
Exhibit Title of
No.
Document
Motion for
Summary
Judgment
Sealed /
Redacted
(Page/Line
Redacted 7:258:1.
8
9
10
11
12
Motion for
Summary
Judgment
13
14
15
16
Redacted 9:2127; 19:19-21;
19:25-20:1.
Reason for Sealing
Court’s Ruling
NNA’s confidential and
proprietary testing data
and analysis by Dr. Paul
Verghese. Disclosure of
this information would
allow competitors to gain
an unfair competitive
advantage to NNA’s
detriment. Latta Decl.,
Dkt. 113-1 ¶¶ 6-11.
NNA’s confidential and
proprietary testing data,
analysis, and warranty
claims data by Dr. Jeya
Padmanaban. Disclosure
of this information would
allow competitors to gain
an unfair competitive
advantage to NNA’s
detriment. Latta Decl.,
Dkt. 113-1 ¶¶ 6-11.
GRANTED
GRANTED
17
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 13th day of December, 2021.
21
A
22
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
23
24
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-01023 RSM
4864-2359-0149 v1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?