Slaughter v. White et al
Filing
99
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 87 Motion to Compel Discovery signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Ossie Slaughter, Prisoner ID: 827869) (TH)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
OSSIE LEE SLAUGHTER,
Plaintiff,
9
10
11
Case No. C16-1067-RSM-JPD
v.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
DAN WHITE, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
14
This is a civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter comes before
15
the Court at the present time on plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery. Defendants oppose
16
plaintiff’s motion. The Court, having considered plaintiff’s motion, defendants’ response
17
thereto, and the balance of the record, hereby ORDERS as follows:
18
(1)
Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery (Dkt. 87) is DENIED. Plaintiff requests in
19
his motion that the Court compel defendants to provide him with discovery because, though he
20
has made a diligent effort to obtain discovery, defendants have made no effort to respond to his
21
requests. Defendants, in their response to plaintiff’s motion to compel, note that plaintiff has not
22
yet served any discovery requests on them and they argue that plaintiff’s motion should therefore
23
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY - 1
1
be denied. (Dkt. 89.) Plaintiff has provided no evidence that he served any proper discovery
2
requests on defendants. Accordingly, this Court agrees that plaintiff’s motion to compel must be
3
denied.
4
(2)
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, to counsel for
5
defendants, and to the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez.
6
DATED this 14th day of August, 2018.
A
7
8
JAMES P. DONOHUE
United States Magistrate Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?