Veljanoski v. Juno Therapeutics, Inc. et al
ORDER denying plaintiff's 70 Motion for leave to file response by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case No. C16-1069 RSM
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
In re JUNO THERAPEUTICS, INC.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Response to
Defendants’ Notice of Supplemental Authority. Dkt. #70. The Court agrees with Defendants
that their Notice of Supplemental Authority (Dkt. #68), complied with Local Rule 7(n) by not
containing argument, and that therefore “there is nothing to which Plaintiffs need to respond.”
Dkt. #71 at 2. Any responsive argument would constitute an improper surreply. The Court
further finds that it need not adjust the noting date of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and that it
can request supplemental briefing from the parties, if necessary, at a future date.
Having reviewed the relevant briefing and the remainder of the record, the Court hereby
finds and ORDERS that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Response to Defendants’ Notice of
Supplemental Authority (Dkt. #70) is DENIED.
DATED this 18th day of May 2017.
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE RESPONSE - 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?