Preston v. Boyer et al

Filing 226

MINUTE ORDER re Parties' 225 Stipulated Notice of Dismissal. All claims in this action are DISMISSED with prejudice, without costs to any party and with each party to bear its own attorney fees and other litigation expenses. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (SR)

Download PDF
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 ROBERT JOHN PRESTON, 10 v. 11 Plaintiff, CASE NO. C16-1106-JCC MINUTE ORDER RYAN BOYER and SNOHOMISH COUNTY, 12 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C. Coughenour, United States District Judge: 17 This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ stipulated notice of dismissal (Dkt. 18 No. 225). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides that a “plaintiff may dismiss 19 an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who 20 have appeared.” Here, the parties nevertheless request that the Court enter a proposed order filed 21 with their stipulation. The parties have stipulated to dismissing all claims with prejudice and the 22 stipulation is signed by all parties who have appeared. (See Dkt. No. 225.) Thus, under Federal 23 Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the stipulation is self-executing. All claims in this action 24 are DISMISSED with prejudice, without costs to any party and with each party to bear its own 25 attorney fees and other litigation expenses. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. 26 // MINUTE ORDER C16-1106-JCC PAGE - 1 1 DATED this 25th day of May 2021. 2 William M. McCool Clerk of Court 3 s/Paula McNabb Deputy Clerk 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 MINUTE ORDER C16-1106-JCC PAGE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?