Lewis v. US Justice Department et al

Filing 48

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 35 by Judge James L. Robart. Mr. Lewis's motion for preliminary injunctive relief is DENIED (Dkt. # 13 ). (PM) cc: plaintiff via the USPS

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 ANTHONY EUGENE LEWIS, 10 11 12 Plaintiff, CASE NO. C16-1112JLR-JPD ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. KING COUNTY, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 Before the court are Plaintiff Anthony Eugene Lewis’s objections (Obj. (Dkt. 15 # 38)) to Magistrate Judge James P. Donohue’s Report and Recommendation (R&R (Dkt. 16 # 35)). The court has examined Mr. Lewis’s objections and concludes that they lack 17 merit. Mr. Lewis’s objections essentially reiterate his arguments from previous filings, 18 and Magistrate Judge Donohue thoroughly addressed Mr. Lewis’s arguments in his 19 Report and Recommendation. (See generally id.) Further, the court has independently 20 reviewed Mr. Lewis’s objections and rejects them for the same reasons that Magistrate 21 Judge Donohue rejected them. 22 ORDER - 1 1 Accordingly, the court OVERRULES Mr. Lewis’s objections (Dkt. # 38) and 2 ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. # 35). Mr. Lewis’s motion for 3 preliminary injunctive relief is DENIED (Dkt. # 13). The court DIRECTS the clerk to 4 send copies of this order to Mr. Lewis, counsel for Defendants, and Magistrate Judge 5 Donohue. 6 Dated this 4th day of January, 2017. 7 8 A 9 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?