Lewis v. US Justice Department et al
Filing
48
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 35 by Judge James L. Robart. Mr. Lewis's motion for preliminary injunctive relief is DENIED (Dkt. # 13 ). (PM) cc: plaintiff via the USPS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
ANTHONY EUGENE LEWIS,
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. C16-1112JLR-JPD
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
v.
KING COUNTY, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
Before the court are Plaintiff Anthony Eugene Lewis’s objections (Obj. (Dkt.
15
# 38)) to Magistrate Judge James P. Donohue’s Report and Recommendation (R&R (Dkt.
16
# 35)). The court has examined Mr. Lewis’s objections and concludes that they lack
17
merit. Mr. Lewis’s objections essentially reiterate his arguments from previous filings,
18
and Magistrate Judge Donohue thoroughly addressed Mr. Lewis’s arguments in his
19
Report and Recommendation. (See generally id.) Further, the court has independently
20
reviewed Mr. Lewis’s objections and rejects them for the same reasons that Magistrate
21
Judge Donohue rejected them.
22
ORDER - 1
1
Accordingly, the court OVERRULES Mr. Lewis’s objections (Dkt. # 38) and
2
ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. # 35). Mr. Lewis’s motion for
3
preliminary injunctive relief is DENIED (Dkt. # 13). The court DIRECTS the clerk to
4
send copies of this order to Mr. Lewis, counsel for Defendants, and Magistrate Judge
5
Donohue.
6
Dated this 4th day of January, 2017.
7
8
A
9
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?