Wheeler v. Colvin
Filing
16
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 15 Stipulated MOTION to Remand by Hon. James P. Donohue. Noting Date 12/21/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Proposed Judgment)(KMP)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
6
7
8
ROBERT WHEELER,
Case No. C16-1120-RBL-JPD
9
Plaintiff,
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
10
v.
11
12
13
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
14
15
Plaintiff brought this action to seek judicial review of the denial of his application for
16
disability benefits by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Dkt. 3. The
17
parties have stipulated that this case should be reversed and remanded for further administrative
18
proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Dkt. 15.
19
Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court recommends that this case be
20
REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings before an Administrative
21
Law Judge (“ALJ”), including a de novo hearing and a new decision. On remand, the ALJ shall
22
reevaluate the medical opinion evidence, including the opinion of Dr. Russell. The ALJ shall
23
also conduct a proper DA&A analysis in accordance with SSR 13-2p.
24
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PAGE - 1
1
2
3
Upon proper application, the Court will consider whether reasonable attorney’s fees and
costs should be awarded pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
Because the parties have stipulated that the case be remanded as set forth above, the
4
Court recommends that United States District Judge Ronald B. Leighton immediately approve
5
this Report and Recommendation. The Clerk should note the matter for December 21, 2016 as
6
ready for Judge Leighton’s consideration. A proposed order accompanies this Report and
7
Recommendation.
8
DATED this 21st day of December, 2016.
A
9
JAMES P. DONOHUE
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?