Moore et al v. Urquhart et al

Filing 65

MINUTE ORDER dismissing claims of plaintiffs Cherrelle Davis and Nina Davis without prejudice for lack of standing ; striking, without prejudice to refiling, plaintiffs' 55 Motion to Certify Class ; parties are to file a Joint Status Report by 1/31/2019 ; case STAYED pending decision on petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)(Cherrelle Davis and Nina Davis terminated.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 EVA MOORE and BROOKE SHAW, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 9 10 11 12 Plaintiffs, v. C16-1123 TSZ MINUTE ORDER MITZI JOHANKNECHT, in her official capacity as KING COUNTY SHERIFF, Defendant. 13 14 15 16 17 18 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: (1) Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report, docket no. 64, the Court ORDERS as follows: (a) The claims of plaintiffs Cherrelle Davis and Nina Davis are DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of standing; (b) Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, docket no. 55, is STRICKEN without prejudice to refiling, if appropriate, at a later date; 19 20 21 (c) On or before January 31, 2019, the parties shall file a Joint Status Report indicating whether defendant has filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court and, if so, whether this matter should be stayed pending a decision on such petition. 22 23 MINUTE ORDER - 1 1 (2) record. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of 2 Dated this 18th day of December, 2018. 3 William M. McCool Clerk 4 5 s/Karen Dews Deputy Clerk 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 MINUTE ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?