Moore et al v. Urquhart et al
Filing
65
MINUTE ORDER dismissing claims of plaintiffs Cherrelle Davis and Nina Davis without prejudice for lack of standing ; striking, without prejudice to refiling, plaintiffs' 55 Motion to Certify Class ; parties are to file a Joint Status Report by 1/31/2019 ; case STAYED pending decision on petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)(Cherrelle Davis and Nina Davis terminated.)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
EVA MOORE and BROOKE SHAW,
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
9
10
11
12
Plaintiffs,
v.
C16-1123 TSZ
MINUTE ORDER
MITZI JOHANKNECHT, in her official
capacity as KING COUNTY SHERIFF,
Defendant.
13
14
15
16
17
18
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge:
(1)
Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report, docket no. 64, the Court
ORDERS as follows:
(a)
The claims of plaintiffs Cherrelle Davis and Nina Davis are
DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of standing;
(b)
Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, docket no. 55, is
STRICKEN without prejudice to refiling, if appropriate, at a later date;
19
20
21
(c)
On or before January 31, 2019, the parties shall file a Joint Status
Report indicating whether defendant has filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the
United States Supreme Court and, if so, whether this matter should be stayed
pending a decision on such petition.
22
23
MINUTE ORDER - 1
1
(2)
record.
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of
2
Dated this 18th day of December, 2018.
3
William M. McCool
Clerk
4
5
s/Karen Dews
Deputy Clerk
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
MINUTE ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?