Shokri v. Boeing Company

Filing 157

ORDER re: parties' 156 Stipulated Motion to Extend the Stay re: defendant's 147 Motion for Bill of Costs. All proceedings related to Defendant's Motion for Costs (Dkt. 147 ), including all responsive briefing and resolution of the motion, is stayed pending the issuance of a mandate pursuant to Plaintiff's appeal. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)

1

THE HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

7
8
9

BEHROUZ SHOKRI,
Plaintiff,

10
11
12

v.
THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware
Corporation,

13

No. 2:16-cv-01132 RSM
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND THE STAY AND THE TIME
FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR COSTS,
DKT 147

Defendant.

14
15
16

Plaintiff Behrouz Shokri (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant The Boeing Company

17

(“Defendant”) (together, the “Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby agree

18

and stipulate to extend the stay of proceedings related to Defendant’s Motion for Costs (Dkt.

19

147), and extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file a response to Defendant’s Motion for Costs to

20

seven days after a mandate is issued in Plaintiff’s appeal. In support, the Parties state as

21

follows:

22
23
24
25

1.

On April 25, 2018, this Court granted Defendant’s Motion for Summary

Judgment.
2.

On May 10, 2018, Defendant filed a Motion for Costs pursuant to F.R.Civ.P.

54(d) and Local Civil Rule (“LCR”) 54(d) (Dkt. 147).

26
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE STAY AND THE
TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR COSTS, DKT 147
(Cause No. 2:16-cv-01132 RSM)
Page 1

THE BLANKENSHIP LAW FIRM, PLLC
1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3250
Seattle, Washington 98104
[phone]

3.

1
2

The District Court granted the parties’ stipulation and proposed order staying

proceedings regarding Defendant’s motion for costs on May 18, 2018 (Dkt. 149).
4.

Plaintiff filed an appeal of the District Court’s rulings on May 22, 2018 (Dkt.

5

5.

The Ninth Circuit filed and entered a judgment on July 2, 2019 (Dkt. 155).

6

6.

Plaintiff intends to file a petition for rehearing/rehearing en banc before a

3
4

7

150).

mandate is issued.

8
9
10

THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate and agree as follows:
1.

All proceedings related to Defendant’s Motion for Costs (Dkt. 147), including

11

all responsive briefing and resolution of the motion, is stayed pending the issuance of a

12

mandate pursuant to Plaintiff’s appeal. Plaintiff will file any opposition to Defendant’s Motion

13

for Costs within seven days of the issuance of a mandate.

14
15

STIPULATED to this 3rd day of July, 2019.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE STAY AND THE
TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR COSTS, DKT 147
(Cause No. 2:16-cv-01132 RSM)
Page 2

THE BLANKENSHIP LAW FIRM, PLLC
1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3250
Seattle, Washington 98104
[phone]

1

Attorneys for Plaintiff:

Attorneys for Defendant:

2

By: s/ Scott C. G. Blankenship
Scott C. G. Blankenship, WSBA No. 21431
Richard E. Goldsworthy, WSBA No. 40684
The Blankenship Law Firm, PLLC
1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3250
Seattle, WA 98104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

By: s/ Matthew J. Scarbaugh
Lincoln O. Bisbee, Admitted Pro Hac Vice
Matthew J. Sharbaugh, Admitted Pro Hac Vice
Morgan Lewis & Blockius LLP
1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8

Laurence A. Shapero, WSBA No. 31301
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak
& Stewart, P.C.
800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4100
Seattle, WA 98104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsímile: [phone]
[e-mail]

9
10
11
12
13

Clifford D. Sethness, WSBA No. 14110
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
300 South Grand Avenue, 22nd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsímile: [phone]
[e-mail]

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 9 day of July 2019.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE STAY AND THE
TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR COSTS, DKT 147
(Cause No. 2:16-cv-01132 RSM)
Page 3

THE BLANKENSHIP LAW FIRM, PLLC
1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3250
Seattle, Washington 98104
[phone]