Shokri v. Boeing Company
Filing
31
ORDER granting plaintiff's 19 Motion to Seal signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
6
7
BEHROUZ SHOKRI.,
8
9
10
11
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. C16-1132RSM
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL
THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware
corporation,
Defendant.
12
13
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Seal. Dkt. #19.
14
Plaintiff seeks to file under seal Exhibits J, K, and L to the Declaration of Jordan A. Taren in
15
Support of Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Answers to Discovery and Production of Documents.
16
17
18
19
Id. These documents were marked “Confidential” by Defendant under the parties’ Protective
Order.
“There is a strong presumption of public access to the court’s files.” Local Rule CR
20
5(g)(2). For nondispositive motions, “this presumption may be overcome by a showing of
21
good cause.” Id. The Court has reviewed the motion, along with the remainder of the record,
22
and now finds good cause to GRANT the motion. The documents identified by Plaintiff
23
24
contain forms and information that are proprietary in nature, as well as sensitive employment
information for a non-party to this litigation. Given the nature of the documents, it is not
25
26
feasible to redact them.
ORDER - 1
1
Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS:
2
1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Seal (Dkt. #19) is GRANTED.
3
4
5
6
2. Exhibits J, K, and L to the Declaration of Jordan A. Taren (Dkts. ##24, #25 and
#27) shall REMAIN UNDER SEAL.
DATED this 8 day of August, 2017.
7
8
A
9
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?