LHF Productions Inc v. Does 1-19

Filing 78

MINUTE ORDER striking as moot Plaintiff's 76 Motion for Extension of Time to File Joint Notice of Appeal. Authorized by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT) Modified on 4/14/2017 (SWT). (cc Defendant Tracy Silvan via USPS)

Download PDF
  1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 10 11 LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No. C16-1175 RSM MINUTE ORDER v. DOE 1, et al., 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Defendants. The following MINUTE ORDER is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez, Chief United States District Judge: On March 17, 2017, Plaintiff LHF Productions, Inc. (“LHF”) filed a Motion for Extension of Time to File Joint Notice of Appeal. Dkt. #76. LHF filed a Notice of Civil 21 Appeal on the same day. See Dkt. #75. Pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of 22 Appellate Procedure, in a civil case a notice of appeal “must be filed with the district clerk 23 within 30 days after entry of the judgment or order appealed from.” Here, the Court entered the 24 Order LHF seeks to appeal on February 15, 2017. See Dkt. #73. Consequently, LHF had until 25 26 March 17, 2017, to file a notice of appeal. Because LHF timely filed its notice of appeal in the 27 Ninth Circuit, LHF’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Joint Notice of Appeal is 28 STRICKEN as MOOT. MINUTE ORDER - 1   1 2 3 DATED this 14th day of April, 2017. 4 WILLIAM McCOOL, Clerk 5 By: /s/ Rhonda Stiles Deputy Clerk 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MINUTE ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?