Green v. Colvin
Filing
21
ORDER granting 20 Stipulated Motion to Remand under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) - by Judge David W. Christel.(SH)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
8
9
10
TYSONIA GREEN,
11
Plaintiff,
13
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
MOTION FOR REMAND
v.
12
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-01211-DWC
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
14
Defendant.
15
16
Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Stipulated Motion for Remand (“Motion”).
17 Dkt. 20. After reviewing the Motion and the relevant record, the Court orders the following:
18
Defendant’s Motion is granted, and the case is reversed and remanded for further
19 administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
20
On remand, the Commissioner shall:
21
•
finding of disability; and
22
23
24
Remand to the Appeals Council to first determine whether the record supports a
•
If the case requires further development, the Appeals Council will remand to an
Administrative Law Judge for a de novo hearing to further evaluate, with the
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION
FOR REMAND - 1
1
assistance of a medical expert, the nature and severity of Plaintiff’s headaches, as
2
well as her subjective complaints and medication side effects and issue a new
3
decision.
4
The parties agree that on proper motion the Court shall consider Plaintiff’s application for
5 costs and attorney fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).
6
Dated this 9th day of March, 2017.
A
7
8
David W. Christel
United States Magistrate Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION
FOR REMAND - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?