Northcutt v. Colvin

Filing 17

ORDER REVERSING AND REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. The Court adopts the 15 Report and Recommendation. The Commissioner's decision is reversed and remanded. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 JACOB K. NORTHCUTT, Plaintiff, 9 10 11 12 v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, CASE NO. C16-1350-RSM-BAT ORDER REVERSING AND REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS Defendant. 13 The Court, after careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of 14 the Honorable Brian A. Tsuchida, United States Magistrate Judge, and the balance of the record, 15 does hereby find and ORDER: 16 1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff objects to the R&R to 17 the extent it recommends affirming the ALJ’s adverse credibility determination. Dkt. 18 #15. He argues that Judge Tsuchida makes the same errors in evaluating the record as 19 the ALJ. Id. at 2-5. The Court disagrees. While Judge Tsuchida recognized that the 20 ALJ’s credibility determination was not error-free, he also determined that the ALJ 21 had a valid reason for discounting his credibility. Having reviewed the record, and 22 Plaintiff’s Objections, the Court is not convinced that Judge Tsuchida’s conclusion is 23 in error. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Objections are denied. ORDER REVERSING AND REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS - 1 1 2) The Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the 2 Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with the Report and 3 Recommendation. 4 3) The Clerk shall provide copies of this Order to the parties and Judge Tsuchida. 5 DATED this 12th day of April, 2017. 6 7 8 A RICARDO S. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER REVERSING AND REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?