Imes v. Colvin
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; The matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for a de novo hearing pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (RS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
8
9
10
LORALEE IMES, parent and guardian
ad litem for C.I., a minor,
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
13
14
17
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of the Social Security
Administration,
Defendant.
15
16
CASE NO. C16-1401-JCC-JRC
The Court, having reviewed the report and recommendation of the Honorable J. Richard
Creatura, United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 17) on Defendant’s unopposed motion for
remand (Dkt. No 16), along with the relevant record, hereby FINDS and ORDERS:
18
19
(1)
The Court ADOPTS the report and recommendation (Dkt. No. 17);
(2)
The matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for a de novo
20
hearing pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g);
21
(3)
This Court retains jurisdiction over this action;
22
(4)
After remand, the Commissioner shall modify or affirm the Commissioner’s
23
findings of fact or the Commissioner’s decision, or both, and shall file with the
Court any such additional or modified findings of fact and decision;
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION - 1
1
(5)
If the outcome still is not fully favorable to Plaintiff, the Commissioner shall file
2
with the Court a transcript of the additional record and testimony on which the
3
Commissioner’s action in modifying or affirming is based, and Plaintiff may seek
4
judicial review by reinstating this case rather than by filing a new complaint; and
5
6
(6)
If the outcome is favorable to Plaintiff, the parties shall move this Court for entry
of judgment.
DATED this 18th day of April 2017.
7
8
9
10
A
11
12
John C. Coughenour
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?