United States of America et al v. Voto Health Care Inc

Filing 12

ORDER per the United States' 10 Notice of Consent and the Relator's 11 Notice of Dismissal, all claims set forth in the Complaint shall be dismissed against the Defendant without prejudice to the Relator and without prejudice to the United States or State of Washington. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)

Download PDF
1 District Judge Ricardo S. Martinez 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and the 12 STATE OF WASHINGTON, ex rel. 13 DARCY J. IRWIN, and DARCY J. IRWIN, Individually, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 16 No. C16-1487-RSM ORDER v. 17 VOTO HEALTH CARE, INC., a 18 Washington Corporation, UBI No. 19 602670735, Defendant. 20 21 The Court, having considered Relator's Notice of Dismissal and the United States' 22 Consent to Dismissal, hereby ORDERS, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1), that: 23 1. Relator having agreed to dismiss all claims raised in this matter; 24 2. All of the claims set forth in the Complaint shall be dismissed against the 25 Defendant without prejudice to the Relator and without prejudice to the United 26 States or State of Washington. 27 // 28 // ORDER - 1 CASE NO. C16-1487-RSM UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 (206) 553-7970 1 DATED this 9 day of April 2018. 2 A 3 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 Presented by: 10 /s/ David East DAVID R. EAST, WSBA #31481 11 Assistant United States Attorney 12 United States Attorney’s Office Western District of Washington 13 700 Stewart St., Suite 5220 14 Seattle, WA 98101-1271 E-mail: david.east@usdoj.gov 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER - 2 CASE NO. C16-1487-RSM UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 (206) 553-7970

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?