Speelmon v Tucker et al
Filing
18
ORDER granting Defendants' 13 Motion to amend answer, affirmative defenses, and counterclaims. Amended answer due within 14 days. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (PM)
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
STEPHEN D. SPEELMON,
10
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
11
12
CASE NO. C16-1526-JCC
MITCHELL TUCKER and SMV
PACKERS, INC.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ motion to amend answer, affirmative
defenses, and counterclaims (Dkt. No. 13). Defendants seek to add counterclaims against
Plaintiff for negligence and indemnification. (Id. at 1–2.) Defendants’ proposed counterclaims
are based on injuries sustained by a crew member, Mr. Chris Logan, of the SALMON BEAUTY,
who has asserted injury claims against Defendants in a separate action. (Id.) The pleading
amendment/third-party action deadline was May 5, 2017. (Dkt. No. 12.) Defendants filed their
motion to amend in time. (Dkt. No. 13.)
Plaintiff opposes the amendment, arguing that it would be futile because (1) Plaintiff has
no direct liability to Mr. Logan under the Jones Act, and (2) Defendants have no remedy for
indemnity under Washington partnership law. (Dkt. No. 14 at 4, 8.) While it is possible that
Defendants’ counterclaims against Plaintiff could be dismissed, this is a matter more
ORDER
PAGE - 1
1
appropriately addressed on a motion to dismiss. The Court will not consider the merits of the
2
claims at this time. Accordingly, Defendants’ motion for leave to amend answer, affirmative
3
defenses, and counterclaims (Dkt. No. 13) is GRANTED. Defendants shall file an amended
4
answer within 14 days of this order.
5
6
DATED this 20th day of June, 2017.
A
7
8
9
John C. Coughenour
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?