National Union Fire Insurance Co of Pittsburgh PA v Seattle School District No. 1

Filing 22

MINUTE ORDER denying Plaintiff's 18 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 3 4 5 NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., 6 7 8 Plaintiff, v. C16-1534 TSZ MINUTE ORDER SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, 9 Defendant. 10 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable 11 Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 (1) Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, docket no. 18, is DENIED. For the purposes of a motion for judgment on the pleadings, “all allegations of fact of the opposing party are accepted as true” and “[t]he allegations of the moving party which have been denied are taken as false.” Austad v. United States, 386 F.2d 147, 149 (9th Cir. 1989). Only if it appears that, on the facts so admitted, the moving party is clearly entitled to judgment as a matter of law can the motion be granted. See id. (citing Walker Distributing Co. v. Lucky Lager Brewing Co., 323 F.2d 1, 3 (9th Cir. 1963)). Here, defendant denies that the policy attached to National Union’s Complaint is a true, correct, and complete copy of Policy No. BE 308 48 67, Answer, ¶ 3.2, and likewise denies that the parties “mutually intended” the Sexual Abuse exclusion endorsements included in Policy Nos. BE 309 11 15, BE 309 11 62, and BE 309 92 07 to use the word “insured” instead of “insurer.” Answer, ¶ 1.2. Taking plaintiff’s allegations to the contrary as false, plaintiff has failed to show that it is clearly entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 19 record. 20 (2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of Dated this 13th day of June, 2017. William M. McCool Clerk 21 22 s/Karen Dews Deputy Clerk 23 MINUTE ORDER - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?