A.T. v. Everett School District et al
ORDER directing the District to respond to Plaintiff's 41 Motion to compel a response to Interrogatory No. 2 subject to the Local Rules for the WDWA. A.T. may file a reply by the noting date. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
CASE NO. C16-1536JLR
EVERETT SCHOOL DISTRICT, et
On September 28, 2017, Plaintiff A.T. filed a motion to compel a response to
Interrogatory No. 2 from Defendant Everett School District (“the District”). (MTC (Dkt.
# 41).) The court reprimands A.T. and her counsel for filing the motion in contravention
of the court’s scheduling order, which requires a party to request a conference with the
court before moving for an order related to discovery. (Sched. Order (Dkt. # 20) at 2.)
The court expects the parties and their counsel to comply with all court orders and
applicable rules and will consider appropriate sanctions for future violations.
ORDER - 1
Nevertheless, given that the deadline for filing discovery motions is September 29, 2017,
and the discovery cutoff is October 30, 2017, the court will consider A.T.’s motion. (See
id. at 1.) Accordingly, the court DIRECTS the District to respond to the motion subject
to the Local Rules for the Western District of Washington. See Local Rules W.D. Wash.
LCR 7(b)(2); id. LCR 7(d). A.T. may, but is not required to, file a reply in support of her
motion no later than the noting date. See id. LCR 7(b)(3); id. LCR 7(d).
Dated this 29th day of September, 2017.
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?